Chadderton T, Wilson C, Bewick M, Glück S
Northeastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 1997 Dec;43(8):1227-34.
Although peripheral blood and bone marrow are usually readily available from patients, present techniques of RNA extraction are tedious, require millilitres of starting material and removal of red blood cells before RNA purification. Further, successful reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification requires the removal of haemoglobin derivatives which interfere with the PCR process. Recently, one step rapid use reagents have become available, claiming to be useful for obtaining high quality RNA from microlitre quantities of whole blood drawn directly from the patient. Their use to date in clinical samples appears limited with little information in the literature documented. In an attempt to overcome this, we tested the Trizol-LS, RNA-STAT-50 and Ultraspec-3 reagents upon a statistically significant number of clinical isolates of fresh and cryopreserved peripheral blood, bone marrow, blood apheresis products and a breast cancer cell line (MCF7) in order to evaluate whether these methods could be applied to routine laboratory use in an RT-PCR method capable of detecting rare gene expression. Our findings showed that there was some variation in the quality of RNA extracted which was indicated by absorbance spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm. 1% agarose gel electrophoresis showed that each of these methods could yield total RNA capable of generating the signature 18S and 28S rRNA bands. Using the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric anova test combined with Dunn's multiple comparison test, the only statistically significant difference (p<0.05) indicated that Trizol-LS was more reliable than RNA-STAT-50-LS and Ultraspec-3 at extracting RNA from fresh peripheral blood. RNA extracted with the Trizol-LS and RNA STAT-50 reagents was successfully amplified in a multiplex RT-PCR reaction for detection of the multi-drug resistance related genes MDR1, the multi-drug resistance related protein (MRP) and topoisomerase IIalpha. Low level MDR1 gene expression could be detected in frozen whole blood. However, PCR products were only seen when the anti-coagulant heparin was removed from all samples prior to cDNA production. RT-PCR amplification was not 100% successful with RNA extracted with Ultraspec-3 reagent. In conclusion, we found that the RNA extracted from whole blood with the Trizol-LS and the RNA-STAT-50 are suitable for use in clinically relevant molecular biology protocols that analyze rare event genes without further purification. Our results indicated that the Trizol-LS reagent was generally more consistent in obtaining a pure and sufficient quantity of RNA from patient material as shown by the mean result of purity and quantity in comparison to either Ultraspec-3 or RNA-STAT-50-LS reagents. Ultraspec-3 is not easily suited for direct use with whole blood products.
虽然患者的外周血和骨髓通常很容易获取,但目前的RNA提取技术繁琐,需要数毫升起始材料,并且在RNA纯化之前要去除红细胞。此外,成功的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)扩增需要去除干扰PCR过程的血红蛋白衍生物。最近,一步法快速使用试剂已经问世,声称可用于从直接采集自患者的微升全血中获取高质量RNA。迄今为止,它们在临床样本中的应用似乎有限,文献中记载的信息很少。为了克服这一问题,我们在统计学上对大量新鲜和冷冻保存的外周血、骨髓、血液单采产品临床分离株以及一种乳腺癌细胞系(MCF7)测试了Trizol-LS、RNA-STAT-50和Ultraspec-3试剂,以评估这些方法是否可应用于能够检测罕见基因表达的RT-PCR方法的常规实验室使用。我们的研究结果表明,通过260和280nm吸光度分光光度法显示,提取的RNA质量存在一些差异。1%琼脂糖凝胶电泳表明,这些方法中的每一种都能产生能够生成特征性18S和28S rRNA条带的总RNA。使用Kruskal-Wallis非参数方差分析测试结合Dunn多重比较测试,唯一具有统计学意义的差异(p<0.05)表明,在从新鲜外周血中提取RNA时,Trizol-LS比RNA-STAT-50-LS和Ultraspec-3更可靠。用Trizol-LS和RNA STAT-50试剂提取的RNA在多重RT-PCR反应中成功扩增,用于检测多药耐药相关基因MDR1、多药耐药相关蛋白(MRP)和拓扑异构酶IIα。在冷冻全血中可检测到低水平的MDR1基因表达。然而,只有在cDNA产生之前从所有样本中去除抗凝剂肝素时,才能看到PCR产物。用Ultraspec-3试剂提取的RNA进行RT-PCR扩增并非100%成功。总之,我们发现用Trizol-LS和RNA-STAT-50从全血中提取的RNA适用于临床相关分子生物学方案,可分析罕见事件基因,无需进一步纯化。我们的结果表明,与Ultraspec-3或RNA-STAT-50-LS试剂相比,Trizol-LS试剂从患者材料中获得纯净且足够数量RNA的总体一致性更高,这从纯度和数量的平均结果可以看出。Ultraspec-3不太适合直接用于全血产品。