Degertekin M, Basaran Y, Gencbay M, Yaymaci B, Dindar I, Turan F
Kosuyolu Heart and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Am Heart J. 1998 Feb;135(2 Pt 1):207-14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70083-3.
The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of flow convergence region method (FCR) to complement well-accepted techniques in assessing mitral valve area (MVA). Fifty-three patients (39 women, 14 men) were enrolled in the study. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed after transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation, and all measurements were performed for each patient. Mean MVA values determined by different methods both in TEE and TTE studies did not differ (p = not significant). In 51 (96%) patients, TEE and TTE were feasible and measurements of MVA with FCR correlated well with the conventional methods (r = 0.87, standard error of the estimate = 0.13 cm2). In TEE, MVA determined by FCR also correlated well with that obtained by the "pressure half time" method (r = 0.90, standard error of the estimate = 0.11 cm2). Results of our study confirmed the feasibility and accuracy of FCR. Because TEE provides reliable estimation of MVA by FCR, intraoperative monitoring by TEE should be considered as a comparative alternative method.
本研究的目的是确定血流会聚区法(FCR)在评估二尖瓣面积(MVA)时补充公认技术的诊断价值。53例患者(39例女性,14例男性)纳入本研究。经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估后进行经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查,对每位患者进行所有测量。TEE和TTE研究中通过不同方法确定的平均MVA值无差异(p =无显著性差异)。51例(96%)患者中,TEE和TTE可行,FCR测量MVA与传统方法相关性良好(r = 0.87,估计标准误差 = 0.13 cm²)。在TEE中,FCR确定的MVA与“压力减半时间”法获得的MVA也相关性良好(r = 0.90,估计标准误差 = 0.11 cm²)。我们的研究结果证实了FCR的可行性和准确性。由于TEE通过FCR能可靠地估计MVA,术中TEE监测应被视为一种可比较的替代方法。