• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后与会阴入路:呼吁行会阴根治性前列腺切除术

[Retropubic and perineal approach: plea for perineal radical prostatectomy].

作者信息

Salomon L, Colombel M, Patard J J, Contremoulins I, Bellot J, Lefrére-Belda M A, Gasman D, Chopin D, Abbou C C

机构信息

Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 1997 Dec;7(6):976-83.

PMID:9490143
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Two surgical approaches are proposed for radical prostatectomy: the retropubic route and the perineal route. We compared the surgical, oncological and functional aspects of these two approaches and present arguments suggesting that the perineal approach is the preferred approach for radical prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

55 retropubic radical prostatectomies were retrospectively compared to 55 perineal radical prostatectomies and performed between March 1992 to December 1995. The clinical TNM, preoperative PSA, results of 6 systematized intrarectal biopsies, operating time, intraoperative bleeding, number of patients transfused and number of packed cell units per patient transfused, medical and surgical complications, catheterization time and length of hospital stay, incidence of urethrovesical anastomosis leak and stenosis, analysis of the prostatectomy specimen, course of PSA, continence and erection were studied.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed for the retropubic and perineal approaches, respectively: preoperative PSA (24 vs 15 ng/mL), intraoperative bleeding (2664 vs 1071 mL), number of patients transfused (91% vs 28%), number of packed cell units per patient transfused (3.9 vs 2.7), medical and surgical complications (56.9 vs 29.1%), anastomotic leak (24.1 vs 7.2%), anastomotic stenosis (31.5 vs 1.8%), duration of catheterization (18 vs 13 days) and length of hospital stay (14 vs 8 days). At 2 years, PSA remained less than 0.5 ng/mL in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Even taking the learning period into account, the perineal approach provides the same results as the retropubic approach in terms of functional and oncological parameters, with a simpler postoperative course for patient.

摘要

目的

根治性前列腺切除术有两种手术入路:耻骨后途径和会阴途径。我们比较了这两种入路在手术、肿瘤学及功能方面的情况,并提出论据表明会阴入路是根治性前列腺切除术的首选入路。

材料与方法

回顾性比较了1992年3月至1995年12月期间进行的55例耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术和55例会阴根治性前列腺切除术。研究了临床TNM分期、术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、6次系统性直肠内活检结果、手术时间、术中出血情况、输血患者数量及每位输血患者的红细胞压积单位数量、内科及外科并发症、导尿时间及住院时间、尿道膀胱吻合口漏及狭窄的发生率、前列腺切除标本分析、PSA变化过程、控尿及勃起情况。

结果

耻骨后和会阴入路分别观察到具有统计学意义的差异:术前PSA(24对15 ng/mL)、术中出血(2664对1071 mL)、输血患者数量(91%对28%)、每位输血患者的红细胞压积单位数量(3.9对2.7)、内科及外科并发症(56.9%对29.1%)、吻合口漏(24.1%对7.2%)、吻合口狭窄(31.5%对1.8%)、导尿持续时间(18对13天)及住院时间(14对8天)。两组在2年时PSA均保持低于0.5 ng/mL。

结论

即使考虑到学习阶段,会阴入路在功能和肿瘤学参数方面与耻骨后入路效果相同,且患者术后恢复过程更简单。

相似文献

1
[Retropubic and perineal approach: plea for perineal radical prostatectomy].耻骨后与会阴入路:呼吁行会阴根治性前列腺切除术
Prog Urol. 1997 Dec;7(6):976-83.
2
Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)<10 ng/ml患者行根治性前列腺切除术的结果及并发症:耻骨后、会阴及腹腔镜入路的比较
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002;5(4):285-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500605.
3
Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.2003年至2005年美国根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.054. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
4
[Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].[耻骨后、会阴及腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘的定位]
Prog Urol. 2002 Sep;12(4):628-34.
5
[Radical prostatectomy: comparison of the perineal and retropubic route (40 patients). Preliminary results].[根治性前列腺切除术:会阴途径与耻骨后途径的比较(40例患者)。初步结果]
Prog Urol. 1994 Feb;4(1):33-9.
6
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与会阴根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌:八年经验
J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 1;95(6):513-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20714.
8
Perineal complications following radical perineal prostatectomy.根治性会阴前列腺切除术后的会阴并发症
Aktuelle Urol. 2003 Jul;34(4):223-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41599.
9
[Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies].[我们最初250例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的并发症及发生率]
Actas Urol Esp. 2010 May;34(5):428-39.
10
Radical retropubic vs. radical perineal prostatectomy: a comparison of relative benefits in four urban hospitals.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与经会阴根治性前列腺切除术:四家城市医院相对获益情况的比较
Urol Nurs. 2007 Dec;27(6):519-26.