• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与会阴根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌:八年经验

Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.

作者信息

Martis Gianni, Diana Massimo, Ombres Maurizio, Cardi Antonio, Mastrangeli Roberta, Mastrangeli Bruno

机构信息

Department of Urology, S. Camillo Hospital, Rieti, Italy.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 1;95(6):513-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20714.

DOI:10.1002/jso.20714
PMID:17226809
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach.

RESULTS

Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌是男性最常见的恶性肿瘤,也是癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。对局限性前列腺癌患者进行了一项随机研究,这些患者接受了经会阴或耻骨后途径的根治性前列腺切除术,比较了肿瘤学结果、癌症控制和功能结果。

研究设计

1997年至2004年期间,在一项随机研究中,200例患者接受了经耻骨后(100例患者)或经会阴(100例患者)途径的根治性前列腺切除术。

结果

住院时间、导尿管引流时间、术中失血量和输血需求方面的差异在统计学上有显著意义,有利于经会阴前列腺切除术。两组在6个月和24个月时手术切缘阳性率和尿失禁情况的差异无统计学意义。24个月时勃起功能的差异在统计学上有显著意义,有利于耻骨后前列腺切除术。

结论

根治性经会阴前列腺切除术是早期前列腺癌根治性手术的一种优秀替代方法。

相似文献

1
Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与会阴根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌:八年经验
J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 1;95(6):513-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20714.
2
Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)<10 ng/ml患者行根治性前列腺切除术的结果及并发症:耻骨后、会阴及腹腔镜入路的比较
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002;5(4):285-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500605.
3
Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.顺行性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2008 Mar;53(3):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
4
The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.解剖性根治性会阴前列腺切除术:基于结果的演变。
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.041. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
5
[Radical perineal prostatectomy--surgical technique, first results].
Georgian Med News. 2007 Feb(143):58-63.
6
[Radical prostatectomy: comparison of the perineal and retropubic route (40 patients). Preliminary results].[根治性前列腺切除术:会阴途径与耻骨后途径的比较(40例患者)。初步结果]
Prog Urol. 1994 Feb;4(1):33-9.
7
[Retropubic and perineal approach: plea for perineal radical prostatectomy].耻骨后与会阴入路:呼吁行会阴根治性前列腺切除术
Prog Urol. 1997 Dec;7(6):976-83.
8
Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中深部静脉丛的选择性结扎与标准结扎:对控尿、失血及切缘状态的影响
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
9
Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后2至4年间尿失禁和勃起功能的变化。
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):731-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.019. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
10
Introducing a new, simple scoring system to evaluate oncological and functional outcome after radical prostatectomy.引入一种新的、简单的评分系统,以评估根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(5):392-5. doi: 10.1080/00365590310006327.

引用本文的文献

1
Open retropubic radical prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3025-3035. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.15.
2
The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.机器人手术时代会阴前列腺切除术的发展与复兴。
World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):821-828. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03004-1. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
3
Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: first experience of 15 cases.机器人辅助经会阴根治性前列腺切除术:15例的首次经验
Turk J Urol. 2017 Dec;43(4):476-483. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.35488. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
4
Current status of robotic surgery in Japan.日本机器人手术的现状。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Mar;56(3):170-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.3.170. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
5
Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy.根治性会阴前列腺切除术——一种真正微创术式的当代复兴:手术概述。比较治疗局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的不同手术技术的优缺点及结果。一项特别关注会阴前列腺切除术的文献综述。
Cent European J Urol. 2012;65(4):188-94. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.04.art2. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
6
Case for resurgence of radical perineal prostatecomy in Indian subcontinent.印度次大陆根治性会阴前列腺切除术复苏的案例
Indian J Urol. 2012 Oct;28(4):418-23. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.105754.
7
Contemporary radical prostatectomy.当代根治性前列腺切除术。
Prostate Cancer. 2011;2011:645030. doi: 10.1155/2011/645030. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
8
Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复率:荟萃分析。
J Sex Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):2538-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01351.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
9
The clinically-integrated randomized trial: proposed novel method for conducting large trials at low cost.临床整合随机试验:一种以低成本开展大型试验的新方法。
Trials. 2009 Mar 5;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-14.