Williams N S
Isle of Man Department of Health and Social Security, Douglas.
Public Health. 1998 Jan;112(1):41-6.
A retrospective study was undertaken on the Isle of Man to see if there was a significant difference in the appropriateness of management of newly identified health problems between routine school entrant medical (routine SEM) and the recently introduced selective school entrant medical (selective SEM) and nurse school entrant assessment (nurse SEA). The study included advice and reassurance as an appropriate health outcome. In total, 602 records were reviewed and a chi-squared analysis undertaken. No significant difference in appropriate management was found between the two procedures when hearing, cardiovascular and testicular health problems were excluded. These health problems were excluded because the screening methods were not directly comparable and disadvantaged the school nurse. Future changes in nurse protocol were identified to reduce unnecessary referrals. The study supports the trend away from routine screens towards health promotion and ongoing surveillance by the school health service in partnership with parents, pupils and teachers as recommended in Reference 1.
在马恩岛进行了一项回顾性研究,以探究新发现的健康问题在常规入学体检(routine SEM)、最近引入的选择性入学体检(selective SEM)和护士入学评估(nurse SEA)之间的管理适宜性是否存在显著差异。该研究将建议和安抚视为合适的健康结果。总共审查了602份记录,并进行了卡方分析。排除听力、心血管和睾丸健康问题后,发现两种检查程序在适宜管理方面没有显著差异。之所以排除这些健康问题,是因为筛查方法无法直接比较,且对学校护士不利。确定了护士方案的未来改进方向,以减少不必要的转诊。该研究支持了从常规筛查转向健康促进的趋势,以及如参考文献1所建议的,学校卫生服务机构与家长、学生和教师合作进行持续监测的趋势。