Shah J, Higgins E T, Friedman R S
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Feb;74(2):285-93. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.2.285.
Study 1 demonstrated that as individuals' promotion-related ideal strength increases, performance on an anagram task is greater for a monetary task incentive framed in terms of gains and nongains (i.e., promotion framed) than one framed in terms of losses and nonlosses (i.e., prevention framed), whereas the reverse is true as individuals' prevention-related ought strength increases. Study 2 further demonstrated that with promotion-framed task incentives, individuals' ideal' strength increases motivation for promotion-related goal attainment means (gaining points), whereas with prevention-framed task incentives, individuals' ought strength increases motivation for prevention-related means (avoiding losing points). These results suggest that motivation and performance are greater when the regulatory focus of task incentives and means match (vs. mismatch) the chronic regulatory focus of the performers.
研究1表明,随着个体与晋升相关的理想强度增加,对于以收益和非收益(即晋升框架)表述的金钱任务激励,在字谜任务中的表现要优于以损失和非损失(即预防框架)表述的激励;而随着个体与预防相关的应然强度增加,情况则相反。研究2进一步表明,对于以晋升框架表述的任务激励,个体的理想强度会增加实现与晋升相关目标手段(得分)的动机;而对于以预防框架表述的任务激励,个体的应然强度会增加与预防相关手段(避免失分)的动机。这些结果表明,当任务激励和手段的调节焦点与执行者的长期调节焦点相匹配(而非不匹配)时,动机和表现会更强。