Sharaf B L, Bourassa M G, McMahon R P, Pepine C J, Chaitman B R, Williams D O, Davies R F, Proschan M, Conti C R
Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Feb;21(2):86-92. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210205.
Patients with ambulatory electrocardiographic (AECG) ST-segment depression and critical coronary narrowing are known to be at increased risk for adverse outcome, but little is known about patients with AECG ST-segment depression without critical coronary narrowing.
The objectives of this study were to characterize the coronary angiographic pathology in patients with AECG ST-segment depression but without critical (< 50% diameter stenosis) coronary narrowing and to compare demographic and clinical findings in these patients with those enrolled in the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot Study with AECG ST-segment depression and critical (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) coronary narrowing.
Coronary angiograms from patients with AECG ST-segment depression were reviewed in a central laboratory and quantitative measurement of percent stenosis was performed. Clinical and angiographic comparisons were made between patients with and without critical coronary narrowing.
Patients without critical coronary narrowing (n = 64) were younger (p = 0.02), less likely to be male (p < 0.001) or to have risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis or a history of myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), and had fewer ischemic episodes per 24 h on the screening AECG (p = 0.02) than patients with critical coronary narrowing (n = 441). Of patients without critical narrowing, one half had angiographic evidence for coronary artery disease (> or = 20% stenosis) and 60% had an ejection fraction > 70%.
Patients with AECG ST-segment depression without critical coronary narrowing are heterogeneous, with half having measurable coronary artery disease. Demographically and clinically, they appear to be different than patients with AECG ST-segment depression with critical coronary narrowing.
动态心电图(AECG)ST段压低且冠状动脉严重狭窄的患者已知不良结局风险增加,但对于无冠状动脉严重狭窄的AECG ST段压低患者知之甚少。
本研究的目的是描述AECG ST段压低但无严重(直径狭窄<50%)冠状动脉狭窄患者的冠状动脉造影病理特征,并将这些患者的人口统计学和临床发现与参加无症状心脏缺血初步研究的AECG ST段压低且严重(直径狭窄≥50%)冠状动脉狭窄患者进行比较。
在中心实验室对AECG ST段压低患者的冠状动脉造影进行回顾,并对狭窄百分比进行定量测量。对有和无严重冠状动脉狭窄的患者进行临床和造影比较。
无严重冠状动脉狭窄的患者(n = 64)比有严重冠状动脉狭窄的患者(n = 441)更年轻(p = 0.02),男性比例更低(p < 0.001),患冠状动脉粥样硬化危险因素或心肌梗死病史的可能性更小(p < 0.001),且筛查AECG每24小时的缺血发作次数更少(p = 0.02)。在无严重狭窄的患者中,一半有冠状动脉疾病的造影证据(狭窄≥20%),60%的射血分数>70%。
无严重冠状动脉狭窄的AECG ST段压低患者具有异质性,一半有可测量的冠状动脉疾病。在人口统计学和临床上,他们似乎与有严重冠状动脉狭窄的AECG ST段压低患者不同。