Porter K
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington, DC 20002, USA.
Int J Health Serv. 1998;28(1):1-12. doi: 10.2190/DGWT-J1H0-1C62-UQH9.
Census data on poverty and income show short-term improvements in 1995, but the trends were not as positive over the longer term. Poverty rates remained higher than they were at comparable points in previous economic cycles. The incomes of lower- and middle-income households grew in 1995, but only the wealthiest fifth of the population completely recovered from the recession of the early 1990s. Although poverty rates fell and incomes rose for most groups in 1995, Hispanic households did not share in the overall economic gains. In addition, economic improvements were not shared by all geographic areas--the reduction in poverty was concentrated in suburban areas. The current poverty measure does not show the full impact of government benefit programs on poverty, as it does not take into account the effect of non-cash benefits or taxes. An alternative poverty measure gives a much better picture of the effectiveness of government benefit programs in reducing poverty.
关于贫困和收入的人口普查数据显示,1995年有短期改善,但长期趋势并非如此乐观。贫困率仍高于前几个经济周期的可比水平。1995年,低收入和中等收入家庭的收入有所增长,但只有最富有的五分之一人口从20世纪90年代初的衰退中完全恢复过来。尽管1995年大多数群体的贫困率下降,收入上升,但西班牙裔家庭并未分享到总体经济增长的成果。此外,并非所有地理区域都实现了经济改善——贫困率的下降集中在郊区。当前的贫困衡量标准没有显示出政府福利计划对贫困的全面影响,因为它没有考虑非现金福利或税收的影响。另一种贫困衡量标准能更好地反映政府福利计划在减少贫困方面的成效。