Goh K T
Quarantine & Epidemiology Department, Ministry of the Environment, Singapore.
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1997 Sep;26(5):664-70.
Despite its well-established integrated nationwide Aedes mosquito control programme which incorporates source reduction, public health education and law enforcement, Singapore has not been spared from the regional resurgence of dengue. The disease incidence has been increasing from 9.3 per 100,000 in 1988 to 102.7 per 100,000 in 1996 at the time when the Aedes house index (HI) has dropped to around 1% from > 25% in the 1960s. Majority of the cases reported from 1990 to 1996 were dengue fever (DF); dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) constituted only 6.7%. The case-fatality rate was 0.1% with 13 (81.3%) of 16 serologically confirmed deaths above 19 years of age. The median age has shifted from 14 years in 1973 to 27 years in 1996. The proportion of primary infections also increased from about one-third in 1990 to nearly half in 1996. All four dengue serotypes have been detected from infected persons with dengue 2 predominating in 1990, 1991 and 1993, dengue 3 in 1992 and 1994 and dengue 1 in 1995 and 1996. The disease incidence was significantly correlated with Aedes aegypti HI and residents of compound houses had a significantly higher rate of infection as well as a higher morbidity rate compared with dwellers of high-rise public housing estates. Seroprevalence surveys confirmed the low level of dengue transmission. The immunity level of the general population has been declining with only 6.4% of children and young adults below 25 years of age possessing haemagglutination-inhibition antibody to dengue 2. It would appear that the successful vector control programme over the last two decades has brought about a paradoxical situation in that outbreaks tend to occur more frequently and with even greater intensity because of the low herd immunity of the population. Until the dengue vaccine is commercially available for mass immunisation of the population, community-based integrated control of Aedes aegypti remains the key to the prevention and control of DF/DHF.
尽管新加坡拥有完善的全国性白纹伊蚊综合防控计划,该计划包括减少滋生地、开展公共卫生教育和执法,但该国仍未能幸免于登革热在该地区的再度流行。发病率从1988年的每10万人9.3例增至1996年的每10万人102.7例,而此时白纹伊蚊房屋指数(HI)已从20世纪60年代的超过25%降至约1%。1990年至1996年报告的大多数病例为登革热(DF);登革出血热(DHF)仅占6.7%。病死率为0.1%,16例经血清学确诊死亡病例中有13例(81.3%)年龄在19岁以上。中位数年龄已从1973年的14岁变为1996年的27岁。初次感染的比例也从1990年的约三分之一增至1996年的近一半。在感染登革热的人群中检测到了所有四种登革热血清型,1990年、1991年和1993年以登革热2型为主,1992年和1994年为登革热3型,1995年和1996年为登革热1型。疾病发病率与埃及伊蚊HI显著相关,与高层公共屋邨居民相比,复合式房屋居民的感染率和发病率显著更高。血清流行率调查证实登革热传播水平较低。普通人群的免疫水平一直在下降,25岁以下儿童和年轻人中仅有6.4%拥有针对登革热2型的血凝抑制抗体。过去二十年成功的病媒控制计划似乎带来了一种自相矛盾的局面,即由于人群的群体免疫力较低,疫情往往更频繁、更严重地发生。在登革热疫苗可供大规模人群免疫接种之前,基于社区的埃及伊蚊综合控制仍然是预防和控制登革热/登革出血热的关键。