Why causing death is not necessarily morally equivalent to allowing to die--a response to Ferguson.
作者信息
Randall F
机构信息
Christchurch Hospital, Fairmile, Christchurch, Dorset.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):373-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.373.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why causing death is not necessarily morally equivalent to allowing to die--a response to Ferguson.为何致人死亡不一定等同于听任死亡——对弗格森的回应
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):373-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.373.
2
Causing death or allowing to die? Developments in the law.致人死亡还是任由死亡？法律的发展。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):368-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.368.
3
Causing death or allowing to die? A rejoinder to Randall's comments.导致死亡还是任由其死亡？对兰德尔评论的回应
J Med Ethics. 1998 Aug;24(4):281-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.4.281.
4
Killing and allowing to die: another look.杀戮与听任死亡：再审视
J Law Med Ethics. 1998 Spring;26(1):55-64, 4. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01906.x.
5
Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die.安乐死、效率以及杀害患者与任由患者死亡之间的历史区别。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):220-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013839.
6
Courting euthanasia?: Tony Bland and the Law Lords.
Ethics Med. 1993 Autumn;9(3):34-7.
7
Rights of the terminally ill patient.晚期绝症患者的权利。
Ann Health Law. 1996(5):169-91.
8
9
Reconsidering the distinction of ordinary and extraordinary treatment: should we go "back to the future"?
HEC Forum. 1996 Dec;8(6):355-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00119943.
10
Euthanasia: law and morality.安乐死：法律与道德
Auckl Univ Law Rev. 1989;6(2):224-44.
引用本文的文献
1
A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol.关于正当非自愿主动安乐死的一个案例：探究《格罗宁根议定书》的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Nov;32(11):643-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014845.
本文引用的文献
1
Causing death or allowing to die? Developments in the law.致人死亡还是任由死亡？法律的发展。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):368-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.368.
Zotero 插件