Könning H, Ackermann B, Seifert T, Wirth C J
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Nov-Dec;135(6):479-85. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039732.
Are there and what are the differences between in-patient and out-patient costs for cemented or noncemented hip prosthesis? How to make it possible to keep in-patient costs within the limit of the a special global amount ("Fallpauschale")?
In this study we compared in-patient and out-patient costs of 30 patients with cemented and 30 patients with noncemented hip prosthesis during the first year after surgery. We developed a perioperative management in order to keep the costs in the limits of the "Fallpauschale".
The average in-patient cost for the cemented prosthesis group was DM 19.644,89 and for the non-cemented group DM 20.485,33. In both groups these costs went beyond the "Fallpauschale" (DM 18.643,80). Comparing the two groups we found significant differences in costs for the endoprosthesis and for laboratory costs. We discovered a suitable perioperative management to keep costs below the "Fallpauschale".
Using an appropriate perioperative management it is possible to keep costs in the given limits.
骨水泥型或非骨水泥型髋关节假体的住院费用和门诊费用有何差异?如何将住院费用控制在特定的总金额(“一次性支付费用”)范围内?
在本研究中,我们比较了30例接受骨水泥型髋关节假体手术的患者和30例接受非骨水泥型髋关节假体手术的患者术后第一年的住院费用和门诊费用。我们制定了围手术期管理方案,以将费用控制在“一次性支付费用”范围内。
骨水泥型假体组的平均住院费用为19644.89德国马克,非骨水泥型组为20485.33德国马克。两组的这些费用均超过了“一次性支付费用”(18643.80德国马克)。比较两组,我们发现假体费用和实验室费用存在显著差异。我们发现了一种合适的围手术期管理方法,可将费用控制在“一次性支付费用”以下。
采用适当的围手术期管理方法,可以将费用控制在规定范围内。