Gross E B
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Beaver College, Glenside, PA 19038, USA.
Women Health. 1997;26(3):1-14. doi: 10.1300/j013v26n03_01.
Studies investigating sources of occupational stress as perceived by male and female physicians in the United States, Canada, and Britain are reviewed. Since men and women experience different conditions of work, such as career and opportunity structures, power, and benefits, gender differences in physician stress would be expected. However, studies in all three countries reveal ambiguous findings, some discovering gender-specific sources of stress among physicians and some not. An explanation for these contrasting results is found in the methodology, especially in how sources of stress were measured. Gender differences surfaced only where open-ended questions were asked, whereas none were found when stress inventories were used. Because much occupational stress research, including that on physicians, is based upon male or predominantly male populations, results do not necessarily apply to women. To solve pragmatic problems of stress on the job, measures of work stress unique to women need to be developed and systematically explored.
本文回顾了关于美国、加拿大和英国的男性和女性医生所感知到的职业压力来源的研究。由于男性和女性经历不同的工作条件,如职业和机会结构、权力及福利,因此预计医生的压力存在性别差异。然而,这三个国家的研究结果都不明确,有些研究发现了医生中特定性别的压力来源,有些则没有。这些相互矛盾的结果的一个解释在于研究方法,尤其是压力来源的测量方式。只有在使用开放式问题时才出现了性别差异,而使用压力量表时则未发现性别差异。由于包括医生研究在内的许多职业压力研究都是基于男性或主要为男性的群体,其结果不一定适用于女性。为了解决工作压力的实际问题,需要开发并系统探索针对女性的工作压力测量方法。