Durbán J J, Monteoliva-Sanchez M, Hita-Villaverde E, Ramos-Cormenzana A
Department of Optics, University of Granada, Spain.
Optom Vis Sci. 1998 Feb;75(2):126-31. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199802000-00016.
The antimicrobial efficiency of 20 commercially available solutions for soaking and rinsing soft contact lenses was studied in relation to 5 bacteria (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, and Serratia marcescens) and 1 fungus (Candida albicans). Each product was separately inoculated with each of six microorganisms, and samples of the inoculated contact lens solutions were taken at predetermined times, placed in a recovery medium, and incubated. Where there was growth, the colonies were counted. There were differences in performance even between solutions labeled as having the same antimicrobial content. One of the solutions marketed in Spain to soak hydrogel contact lenses failed to inactivate all six test strains.
研究了20种市售的用于浸泡和冲洗软性隐形眼镜的溶液对5种细菌(大肠杆菌、表皮葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、枯草芽孢杆菌和粘质沙雷氏菌)和1种真菌(白色念珠菌)的抗菌效果。每种产品分别接种六种微生物中的每一种,在预定时间采集接种后的隐形眼镜溶液样本,置于恢复培养基中并进行培养。有生长的地方,对菌落进行计数。即使是标记为具有相同抗菌成分的溶液,其性能也存在差异。西班牙市场上销售的一种用于浸泡水凝胶隐形眼镜溶液未能使所有六种测试菌株失活。