Murakami T, Yoshioka M, Okamoto I, Yumoto R, Higashi Y, Okahara K, Yata N
Department of Biopharmaceutics, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Japan.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998 Jan;50(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb03305.x.
Microdialysis has been used to determine the concentration of salicylic acid in skin tissue and plasma periodically for 4 h to evaluate the effect of ointment bases on topical and transdermal delivery of salicylic acid. The ointment bases examined were solbase (water-soluble), poloid and white petrolatum (oleaginous), hydrophilic poloid (water in oil (w/o) type emulsion lacking water) and absorptive ointment (w/o-type emulsion containing water). The ointments (0.1 g) containing 25 micromol salicylic acid were applied for 2 h to the surface of rat skin (1 cm2) with (intact) or without the stratum corneum. For intact skin, the extent of topical delivery from different ointments, evaluated by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of salicylic acid in the skin tissue (AUCskin), increased in the order solbase << white petrolatum, poloid, hydrophilic poloid << absorptive ointment. The ratio of AUCskin (topical delivery) to the AUC of salicylic acid in plasma (AUCplasma, transdermal delivery) varied remarkably among the different bases, the greatest ratio being observed for absorptive ointment. When the ointments were applied to skin surface without stratum corneum, AUCskin for solbase was much higher (about 45 times that for intact skin), whereas only a small (two-fold) increase was observed for poloid and hydrophilic poloid and the increase was negligible for white petrolatum and absorptive ointment. For skin without the stratum corneum, the ratio AUCskin/AUCplasma for the different ointments was comparable, although the magnitudes of AUCskin and AUCplasma still varied substantially. The variance of AUC values arises as a result of the different rates of release of salicylic acid from the bases. These results indicate that: the topical and transdermal delivery of salicylic acid in intact skin varies substantially among different ointment bases, and the greatest topical delivery is observed for absorptive ointment; use of absorptive ointment increases the retention of salicylic acid in the stratum corneum; and the stratum corneum functions strongly as a penetration barrier for solbase, moderately for poloid and hydrophilic poloid, and less for absorptive ointment and white petrolatum.
已采用微透析法每隔4小时测定皮肤组织和血浆中水杨酸的浓度,持续4小时,以评估软膏基质对水杨酸局部给药和透皮给药的影响。所检测的软膏基质有solbase(水溶性)、poloid和白凡士林(油性)、亲水性poloid(油包水(w/o)型乳液,不含水)和吸收性软膏(含水乳包油(w/o)型乳液)。将含25微摩尔水杨酸的软膏(0.1克)涂抹于有(完整)或无角质层的大鼠皮肤表面(1平方厘米)2小时。对于完整皮肤,通过皮肤组织中水杨酸浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUCskin)评估不同软膏的局部给药程度,其增加顺序为solbase << 白凡士林、poloid、亲水性poloid << 吸收性软膏。不同基质中,AUCskin(局部给药)与血浆中水杨酸AUC(AUCplasma,透皮给药)的比值差异显著,吸收性软膏的比值最大。当软膏涂抹于无角质层的皮肤表面时,solbase的AUCskin高得多(约为完整皮肤的45倍),而poloid和亲水性poloid仅略有增加(两倍),白凡士林和吸收性软膏的增加可忽略不计。对于无角质层的皮肤,不同软膏的AUCskin/AUCplasma比值相当,尽管AUCskin和AUCplasma的大小仍有很大差异。AUC值的差异是由于水杨酸从基质中的释放速率不同所致。这些结果表明:完整皮肤中水杨酸的局部给药和透皮给药在不同软膏基质之间有很大差异,吸收性软膏的局部给药效果最佳;使用吸收性软膏可增加水杨酸在角质层中的保留;角质层作为solbase的渗透屏障作用很强,对poloid和亲水性poloid作用中等,对吸收性软膏和白凡士林作用较小。