Suppr超能文献

急性结石性胆囊炎的内镜治疗

Endoscopic management of acute calculous cholangitis.

作者信息

Sharma B C, Agarwal D K, Baijal S S, Saraswat V A, Choudhuri G, Naik S R

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Dec;12(12):874-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1997.tb00386.x.

Abstract

Acute cholangitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic drainage procedures have been shown to be a safe and effective mode of treatment in acute cholangitis. As there is paucity of large series on endoscopic management of acute cholangitis, a study was performed to evaluate safety and efficiency of endoscopic biliary decompression in acute cholangitis. The study included 89 consecutive patients (mean age 55+/-15 years; range 35-70 years; 50 males) with acute cholangitis requiring biliary drainage. Main presenting features were upper abdominal pain (84%), fever with chills (90%) and jaundice (74%). Altered sensorium, hypotension, features of peritonitis and acute renal failure were present in 15, 11, 18 and 5%, respectively. Endoscopic procedures performed were endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) with stone extraction (n=40); ES with endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD; n=30); ENBD without ES (n=8); and ES with stent placement (n=11). Of the 89 patients, 85 (95%) responded within 48-72 h. Endoscopic common duct clearance could be achieved in 58 of 78 (74%) patients, whereas in 11 patients undergoing stent placement, stone extraction was not attempted. Complications included post-sphincterotomy bleed (n=2), retroduodenal perforation (n=1) and acute pancreatitis (n=1) with an overall complication rate of 4.4%. All the complications were seen in patients undergoing ES with stone extraction. Mortality was 3.3%. In conclusion, endoscopic biliary drainage is a safe and effective mode of treatment for acute cholangitis. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage or stent placement is safer than ES in acute cholangitis as an initial step.

摘要

急性胆管炎与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。内镜下引流术已被证明是治疗急性胆管炎的一种安全有效的方法。由于关于急性胆管炎内镜治疗的大型系列研究较少,因此进行了一项研究以评估内镜下胆道减压在急性胆管炎中的安全性和有效性。该研究纳入了89例连续的因急性胆管炎需要进行胆道引流的患者(平均年龄55±15岁;范围35 - 70岁;男性50例)。主要临床表现为上腹部疼痛(84%)、发热伴寒战(90%)和黄疸(74%)。意识改变、低血压、腹膜炎体征和急性肾衰竭的发生率分别为15%、11%、18%和5%。所进行的内镜操作包括内镜括约肌切开术(ES)联合取石(n = 40);ES联合内镜鼻胆管引流(ENBD;n = 30);单纯ENBD(n = 8);以及ES联合支架置入(n = 11)。89例患者中,85例(95%)在48 - 72小时内有反应。78例患者中有58例(74%)实现了内镜下胆总管清除,而在11例接受支架置入的患者中,未尝试取石。并发症包括括约肌切开术后出血(n = 2)、十二指肠后穿孔(n = 1)和急性胰腺炎(n = 1),总体并发症发生率为4.4%。所有并发症均见于接受ES联合取石的患者。死亡率为3.3%。总之,内镜下胆道引流是治疗急性胆管炎的一种安全有效的方法。在急性胆管炎中,作为初始步骤,内镜鼻胆管引流或支架置入比ES更安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验