Lee Danny W H, Chan Angus C W, Lam Yuk-Hoi, Ng Enders K W, Lau James Y W, Law Bonita K B, Lai Chi-wai, Sung Joseph J Y, Chung S C Sydney
Department of Surgery and Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Sep;56(3):361-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70039-4.
Endoscopic drainage has replaced emergent surgery for biliary decompression in patients with acute cholangitis. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy of the nasobiliary catheter and indwelling stent as temporary measures for biliary decompression in acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones.
Over a 60-month period, 79 patients with acute cholangitis who required emergent endoscopic drainage were recruited. Indications for urgent drainage included any one of the following: temperature greater than 39 degrees C, septic shock with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, increasing abdominal pain, and impaired level of consciousness. Patients who had previously undergone sphincterotomy or had coexisting intrahepatic duct stones were excluded. After successful bile duct cannulation, patients were randomized to receive either a nasobiliary catheter or indwelling stent without sphincterotomy for biliary decompression. Outcome measures included procedure time, complications, clinical response, and patient discomfort (scored with a 10-cm, unscaled visual analog score).
Of the 79 patients, 5 were excluded because of previous sphincterotomy and intrahepatic duct stones, 40 were randomized to receive a nasobiliary catheter (NBC group), and 34 to receive indwelling stent (stent group). Demographic data were similar between the groups. All procedures were successful in the NBC group; there was one failure in the stent group. The mean (SD) procedure time was similar (NBC group 14.0 [9.3] minutes vs. stent group 11.4 [7.2] min). There were 2 ERCP-related complications in the NBC group. Four patients pulled out the nasobiliary catheter and one catheter became kinked. One stent occluded. There was a significantly lower mean (SD) patient discomfort score on day 1 after the procedure in the stent group (stent group 1.8 [2.6] vs. NBC group 3.9 [2.7]; p = 0.02 t test). The overall mortality rate was 6.8% (2.5% NBC group vs. 12% stent group).
Endoscopic biliary decompression by nasobiliary catheter or indwelling stent was equally effective for patients with acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones. The indwelling stent was associated with less postprocedure discomfort and avoided the potential problem of inadvertent removal of the nasobiliary catheter.
内镜引流已取代急诊手术,用于急性胆管炎患者的胆道减压。本研究的目的是前瞻性比较鼻胆管导管和留置支架作为胆管结石所致急性化脓性胆管炎胆道减压临时措施的疗效。
在60个月的时间里,招募了79例需要急诊内镜引流的急性胆管炎患者。紧急引流的指征包括以下任何一项:体温高于39摄氏度、收缩压低于90毫米汞柱的感染性休克、腹痛加重以及意识水平受损。排除先前接受过括约肌切开术或合并肝内胆管结石的患者。成功进行胆管插管后,患者被随机分为接受鼻胆管导管或留置支架而不进行括约肌切开术以进行胆道减压。观察指标包括手术时间、并发症、临床反应和患者不适(用10厘米无刻度视觉模拟评分法评分)。
79例患者中,5例因先前的括约肌切开术和肝内胆管结石被排除,40例被随机分配接受鼻胆管导管(NBC组),34例接受留置支架(支架组)。两组的人口统计学数据相似。NBC组所有手术均成功;支架组有1例失败。平均(标准差)手术时间相似(NBC组14.0[9.3]分钟对支架组11.4[7.2]分钟)。NBC组有2例与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关的并发症。4例患者拔出了鼻胆管导管,1根导管出现扭结。1个支架堵塞。术后第1天,支架组患者的平均(标准差)不适评分显著较低(支架组1.8[2.6]对NBC组3.9[2.7];t检验,p = 0.02)。总死亡率为6.8%(NBC组2.5%对支架组12%)。
对于胆管结石所致急性化脓性胆管炎患者,鼻胆管导管或留置支架进行内镜胆道减压同样有效。留置支架术后不适较少,避免了鼻胆管导管意外拔除的潜在问题。