• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

防御性反应中左额叶脑激活是否存在性别特异性?

Is left frontal brain activation in defensiveness gender specific?

作者信息

Kline J P, Allen J J, Schwartz G E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University, Cheney, Washington 99004-2431, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Feb;107(1):149-53. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.1.149.

DOI:10.1037//0021-843x.107.1.149
PMID:9505047
Abstract

A. J. Tomarken and R. J. Davidson (1994) reported that defensiveness is characterized by relative left frontal brain activation. Because they examined only women, gender differences in this relation are possible. In the present study, resting alpha asymmetries in right-handed men (n = 25) and women (n = 60) were related to defensiveness, measured by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire L scale. These results were similar to those of Tomarken and Davidson in that defensiveness correlated positively with relative left frontal activation in women. An unexpected finding was that high-defensive men showed relative right frontal activation, a result virtually opposite that for women. These results imply that the nature of defensiveness as a coping strategy may vary as a function of gender.

摘要

A. J. 托马肯和R. J. 戴维森(1994年)报告称,防御性的特征是左额叶大脑相对活跃。由于他们只研究了女性,所以这种关系中可能存在性别差异。在本研究中,通过艾森克人格问卷L量表测量的防御性与右利手男性(n = 25)和女性(n = 60)的静息阿尔法不对称性有关。这些结果与托马肯和戴维森的结果相似,即女性的防御性与左额叶相对激活呈正相关。一个意外的发现是,高防御性的男性表现出右额叶相对激活,这一结果与女性几乎相反。这些结果表明,防御性作为一种应对策略的本质可能因性别而异。

相似文献

1
Is left frontal brain activation in defensiveness gender specific?防御性反应中左额叶脑激活是否存在性别特异性?
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Feb;107(1):149-53. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.1.149.
2
Frontal brain activation in repressors and nonrepressors.压抑者与非压抑者的额叶脑激活情况。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1994 May;103(2):339-49. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.103.2.339.
3
Gender specificity of resting anterior electroencephalographic asymmetry and defensiveness in the elderly.老年人静息状态下脑电图前侧不对称性与防御性的性别特异性
J Gend Specif Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;2(4):35-9.
4
The failed repressor: EEG asymmetry as a moderator of the relation between defensiveness and depressive symptoms.失败的抑制者:脑电图不对称性作为防御性与抑郁症状之间关系的调节因素
Int J Psychophysiol. 2008 Jun;68(3):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.02.002.
5
Is running away right? The behavioral activation-behavioral inhibition model of anterior asymmetry.逃跑是正确的吗?前脑不对称性的行为激活-行为抑制模型。
Emotion. 2008 Apr;8(2):232-49. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.232.
6
Manipulation of frontal EEG asymmetry through biofeedback alters self-reported emotional responses and facial EMG.通过生物反馈调节额叶脑电图不对称性会改变自我报告的情绪反应和面部肌电图。
Psychophysiology. 2001 Jul;38(4):685-93.
7
Life events, frontal electroencephalogram laterality, and functional immune status after acute psychological stressors in adolescents.
Psychosom Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;59(2):178-86. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199703000-00010.
8
Frontal hemisphere lateralization and depressive personality traits.额叶半球的偏侧化与抑郁性人格特质
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Dec;77(3 Pt 1):1035-42. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.77.3.1035.
9
Regional brain activity and strenuous exercise: predicting affective responses using EEG asymmetry.局部脑活动与剧烈运动:利用脑电图不对称性预测情感反应
Biol Psychol. 2007 May;75(2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Mar 25.
10
Relative frontal brain asymmetry and cortisol release after social stress: The role of action orientation.社交应激后相对额叶脑不对称性与皮质醇释放:行动取向的作用。
Biol Psychol. 2016 Mar;115:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiological features in women with antenatal depressive symptoms: a resting-state quantitative electroencephalography study.有产前抑郁症状女性的神经生理特征:一项静息态定量脑电图研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02078-w.
2
Sex-related differences in behavioral and amygdalar responses to compound facial threat cues.性别相关的行为和杏仁核对复合面部威胁线索的反应差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2725-2741. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24035. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
High responsivity to threat during the initial stage of perception in repression: a 3 T fMRI study.
压抑状态下知觉初始阶段对威胁的高反应性:一项 3T fMRI 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Nov;7(8):980-90. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr080. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
4
Adaptive style and physiological reactivity during a laboratory stress paradigm in children with cancer and healthy controls.癌症患儿与健康对照儿童在实验室应激范式下的适应风格和生理反应性。
J Behav Med. 2011 Oct;34(5):372-80. doi: 10.1007/s10865-011-9321-0. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
5
Oppositional children differ from healthy children in frontal brain activation.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000 Jun;28(3):267-75. doi: 10.1023/a:1005196320909.