Suppr超能文献

手术室屏障材料——必要还是奢侈?

OR barrier materials--necessity or extravagance?

作者信息

Belkin N L, Koch F T

机构信息

Surgical Services, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, USA.

出版信息

AORN J. 1998 Feb;67(2):443-5. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62893-7.

Abstract

The issue at hand, therefore, is not one of reusable versus disposable, but rather the cost-effectiveness and expense associated with use of barrier versus nonbarrier materials. As mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the need and function of the surgeons' gown barrier is a given. Initially the gown was used to protect the patient from members of the surgical team; its role now is to protect the surgical team members from the patient and the hazards associated with exposure to bloodborne pathogens. As for barrier drapes (i.e., patient, Mayo stand, back table covers), considering the influence of today's antibiotics and the advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques on the incidence of postoperative infection, just how necessary are they? Initially the use of barrier drapes was viewed as a reasonable practice. The problem, however, with any reasonable type of practice of this nature is identifying the kind and quality of supporting evidence and testing the practice itself. If there is no evidence for or against a practice; its advocates make up the process as they go along. In the case of barrier drapes, there were individuals who assumed that there were studies that conclusively demonstrated their need, even though they never sought confirmation to that effect. In the process, whether the drapes were cost-effective escaped criticism, and their use survived over the years because of the "that's the way we've always done it" syndrome. In a comprehensive examination of draping practices written 60 years ago, a physician discusses the myriad sources of contamination that could contribute to postoperative infection. He concluded that "to minimize the chances of contamination, all of these sources must be separately and individually studied." In terms of the influence of barrier surgical drapes, there remains a need for unbiased, statistically valid, conclusive research. Until such data become available, their use cannot be indisputably defended.

摘要

因此,当前的问题并非是可重复使用与一次性使用的问题,而是使用屏障材料与非屏障材料的成本效益及费用问题。根据美国职业安全与健康管理局的规定,外科医生手术服屏障的必要性和功能是确定的。最初,手术服是用来保护患者免受手术团队成员的感染;现在其作用是保护手术团队成员免受患者感染以及免受与接触血源性病原体相关的危害。至于屏障手术单(即患者、梅奥手术台、后手术台覆盖物),考虑到当今抗生素的影响以及微创手术技术的出现对术后感染发生率的影响,它们到底有多必要呢?最初,使用屏障手术单被视为一种合理的做法。然而,这种性质的任何合理做法的问题在于确定支持证据的种类和质量以及对该做法本身进行检验。如果没有支持或反对某种做法的证据,其倡导者就会在实施过程中自行其是。就屏障手术单而言,有些人认为有研究确凿地证明了其必要性,尽管他们从未寻求过相关证实。在此过程中,手术单是否具有成本效益无人质疑,而且由于“我们一直都是这样做的”这种思维定式,它们多年来一直被使用。在60年前撰写的一篇关于铺单做法的综合研究中,一位医生讨论了可能导致术后感染的各种污染来源。他得出结论:“为了将污染几率降至最低,必须对所有这些来源进行分别且单独的研究。”就屏障手术单的影响而言,仍然需要无偏见、具有统计学有效性的结论性研究。在获得此类数据之前,其使用无法得到无可争议的辩护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验