• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《道德行为测试》的开发、信度和效度测试:一项针对护士道德行为的测评工具

Development, reliability, and validity testing of the Ethical Behavior Test: a measure for nurses' ethical behavior.

作者信息

Dierckx de Casterlé B, Grypdonck M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M

机构信息

University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Nurs Meas. 1997 Summer;5(1):87-112.

PMID:9505471
Abstract

The need for reliable and valid measures for ethical behavior of nurses has encouraged the authors to develop a new instrument to measure students' ethical behavior in daily nursing dilemmas. Characteristic of the instrument presented is the inclusion of two fundamental components of ethical behavior: (1) ethical reasoning (and the resulting decision), and (2) the actual implementation of the ethical decision. As for many instruments, Kohlberg's theory of moral development has been used as the conceptual framework. However, Kohlberg's abstract justice orientation was refined by a care perspective and representative nursing dilemmas were used to make the instrument conceptually more appropriate for measuring nurses' ethical behavior. The analysis of the psychometric properties of the instrument has provided several relevant indications for the reliability and validity of the ethical reasoning and implementation scores. The revealed inconsistencies in the Ethical Behavior Test could be satisfactorily interpreted in terms of Kohlberg's theory and related empirical research findings, supporting the reliability of the ethical behavior scores. The content validity rests upon the careful development of the instrument resulting in an optimal mix of dilemmas, arguments and care situations to reveal nurses' ethical behavior and in a substantial degree of correspondence between the concept and operationalization. The congruency between the patterns of ethical behavior and Kohlberg's theoretical insights about ethical reasoning and practice support the construct validity of the instrument.

摘要

对衡量护士道德行为的可靠且有效的方法的需求促使作者开发一种新工具,以测量学生在日常护理困境中的道德行为。所呈现工具的特点是纳入了道德行为的两个基本组成部分:(1)道德推理(以及由此产生的决策),以及(2)道德决策的实际执行。与许多工具一样,科尔伯格的道德发展理论被用作概念框架。然而,科尔伯格的抽象正义取向通过关怀视角得到了完善,并使用具有代表性的护理困境使该工具在概念上更适合衡量护士的道德行为。对该工具心理测量特性的分析为道德推理和执行得分的可靠性和有效性提供了若干相关指标。在《道德行为测试》中揭示的不一致之处可以根据科尔伯格的理论和相关实证研究结果得到令人满意的解释,这支持了道德行为得分的可靠性。内容效度取决于该工具的精心开发,从而产生困境、论据和关怀情境的最佳组合,以揭示护士的道德行为,并在很大程度上使概念与操作化之间保持一致。道德行为模式与科尔伯格关于道德推理和实践的理论见解之间的一致性支持了该工具的结构效度。

相似文献

1
Development, reliability, and validity testing of the Ethical Behavior Test: a measure for nurses' ethical behavior.《道德行为测试》的开发、信度和效度测试:一项针对护士道德行为的测评工具
J Nurs Meas. 1997 Summer;5(1):87-112.
2
Nurses' responses to ethical dilemmas in nursing practice: meta-analysis.护士在护理实践中对伦理困境的应对:荟萃分析
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Sep;63(6):540-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04702.x.
3
Construction and testing of the Moral Development Scale for Professionals (MDSP).专业人员道德发展量表(MDSP)的构建与测试。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Apr;32(3):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 14.
4
Challenging misperceptions about nurses' moral reasoning.挑战对护士道德推理的错误认知。
Nurs Res. 1992 Nov-Dec;41(6):324-31.
5
Nurses' assessments and patients' perceptions: development of the Night Nursing Care Instrument (NNCI), measuring nursing care at night.护士的评估与患者的认知:夜间护理护理工具(NNCI)的开发,用于衡量夜间护理。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Jul;42(5):569-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.004.
6
Nursing students' responses to ethical dilemmas in nursing practice.护理专业学生对护理实践中伦理困境的应对
Nurs Ethics. 1997 Jan;4(1):12-28. doi: 10.1177/096973309700400103.
7
The development of moral judgment during nursing education in Finland.芬兰护理教育中道德判断的发展
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Oct;24(7):538-46. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.07.005.
8
Development and psychometric evaluation of the instrument: attitude toward patient advocacy.该工具的开发与心理测量学评估:对患者维权的态度
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Feb;31(1):63-75. doi: 10.1002/nur.20233.
9
Developing a valid and reliable Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance scale.开发一个有效且可靠的临床操作自我效能感量表。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Jun;56(2):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00685.x.
10
The nurse-nurse collaboration scale.护士-护士合作量表。
J Nurs Adm. 2010 Jan;40(1):17-25. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181c47cd6.

引用本文的文献

1
Empirical ethics in action: lessons from two empirical studies in nursing ethics.
Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(1):31-9. doi: 10.1023/b:mhep.0000021847.29505.2c.