Suppr超能文献

儿童哮喘的治疗。吸入疗法的选择及理论依据。

Treatment of childhood asthma. Options and rationale for inhaled therapy.

作者信息

Powell C V, Everard M L

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Paediatrics, Sheffield Children's Hospital, England.

出版信息

Drugs. 1998 Feb;55(2):237-52. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855020-00005.

Abstract

Epidemiological studies suggest the prevalence of asthma is increasing, though some remain sceptical as to the magnitude or indeed the presence of an increase. However, despite improved diagnosis and the availability of the potent drugs now available there remains considerable respiratory morbidity associated with asthma. It is clear from a number of studies that failure to deliver drugs to the lungs when using inhaler devices is a factor contributing to this high level of morbidity. Failure of drug delivery may result from the prescribing of inappropriate devices, failure to use devices appropriately or failure to comply with a treatment regimen. For most of the currently available forms of asthma therapy there are significant advantages to be gained from administering them in aerosol form. The benefits to be derived from administering these drugs as an aerosol include a rapid onset of action for drugs such as beta-agonists and a low incidence of systemic effects from drugs such as beta-agonists and corticosteroids. Over the past 25 years our understanding of the nature of asthma has changed. Though this has been reflected in the emphasis on inhaled corticosteroid therapy in recent guidelines, it has not been reflected in the range of inhaler devices available. Manufacturers continue to place drugs such as corticosteroids in the same devices as short acting beta-agonists even though the requirements for these different drug classes are very different. It is likely that this contributes to suboptimal therapeutic responses with inhaled corticosteroids. However, the variability associated with current delivery systems is relatively small compared with the variability introduced by poor compliance. There is no work currently available to indicate how the use of cheap disposable devises which do not incorporate any form of positive feedback influence compliance with inhaled steroids. Optimising aerosolised drug delivery in childhood involves consideration of the class of drugs, the particular drug within a class but more importantly, the age and abilities of the child. Devices must be selected to suit a particular child's needs and abilities. Devices utilising tidal breathing are generally used such as spacing chambers or, less commonly these days, nebulisers. A screaming or struggling child, or failure to use a closely fitting mask, reduces drug delivery to the lungs enormously. Failure to respond to inhaled therapy in early childhood may be attributable to failure of drug delivery. Drug delivery in early childhood using current devices remains more an art than a science.

摘要

流行病学研究表明哮喘的患病率在上升,不过有些人对其上升幅度甚至是否真的存在上升仍持怀疑态度。然而,尽管诊断有所改善且现在有了强效药物,但与哮喘相关的呼吸道发病率仍然很高。从多项研究中可以清楚地看出,使用吸入装置时未能将药物送达肺部是导致这种高发病率的一个因素。药物输送失败可能是由于开具了不合适的装置、未正确使用装置或未遵守治疗方案。对于目前大多数可用的哮喘治疗形式,以气雾剂形式给药有显著优势。将这些药物制成气雾剂给药的益处包括β受体激动剂等药物起效迅速,以及β受体激动剂和皮质类固醇等药物的全身效应发生率低。在过去25年里,我们对哮喘本质的认识发生了变化。尽管这在近期指南中对吸入性皮质类固醇疗法的强调中有所体现,但在可用的吸入装置范围上并未得到体现。制造商继续将皮质类固醇等药物与短效β受体激动剂置于同一装置中,尽管这两类不同药物的要求差异很大。这很可能导致吸入性皮质类固醇的治疗反应欠佳。然而,与依从性差所带来的变异性相比,当前给药系统的变异性相对较小。目前没有研究表明使用不包含任何形式正反馈的廉价一次性装置如何影响吸入性类固醇的依从性。在儿童中优化气雾剂给药需要考虑药物类别、某一类别中的特定药物,但更重要的是儿童的年龄和能力。必须选择适合特定儿童需求和能力的装置。通常使用利用潮气呼吸的装置,如储雾罐,如今较少使用的雾化器。哭闹或挣扎的儿童,或未使用贴合紧密的面罩,会极大地减少药物向肺部的输送。儿童早期对吸入治疗无反应可能归因于药物输送失败。使用当前装置在儿童早期进行药物输送更多的是一门艺术而非科学。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验