Björkroth J, Korkeala H
Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Food Microbiol. 1997 Sep 16;38(2-3):117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(97)00097-4.
Aseptically handled Frankfurters were treated with a commercial Lactobacillus alimentarius biopreservative and inoculated with different cell concentrations of four ropy slime-producing Lactobacillus sake strains. The packages were vacuum sealed and kept at 6 degrees C for 28 days, after which the production of ropy slime was evaluated. The inoculation test was controlled by sealing the different control packages containing either aseptically manufactured sausages without any bacterial inoculation, packages containing biopreservative only or packages inoculated only with the four different ropy slime-producing strains. Authenticity of the biopreservative strain after the cold storage period was ascertained by performing EcoRI restriction endonuclease analysis of 30 randomly selected isolates originating from the biopreservative control packages. All patterns were identical to the pattern of the original L. alimentarius biopreservative strain. The biopreservative was found to be ineffective against the four ropy slime-producing L. sake strains. The strongest slime producers inoculated with approximately 1 colony forming units (CFU)/cm2 could compete efficiently with the L. alimentarius inoculated at a level of 10(7) CFU/cm2 on sausage surfaces. This commercial biopreservative failed to occupy the vital niche of the four ropy slime-producing L. sake strains leading to spoilage in almost all packages.
将无菌处理的法兰克福香肠用市售的嗜酸乳杆菌生物防腐剂处理,并接种不同细胞浓度的四种产生粘性黏液的清酒乳杆菌菌株。包装进行真空密封,在6摄氏度下保存28天,之后评估粘性黏液的产生情况。接种试验通过密封不同的对照包装来控制,这些对照包装包含未进行任何细菌接种的无菌生产香肠、仅含生物防腐剂的包装或仅接种四种不同产生粘性黏液菌株的包装。通过对从生物防腐剂对照包装中随机选取的30个分离株进行EcoRI限制性内切酶分析,确定冷藏期后生物防腐剂菌株的真实性。所有图谱均与原始嗜酸乳杆菌生物防腐剂菌株的图谱相同。发现该生物防腐剂对四种产生粘性黏液的清酒乳杆菌菌株无效。接种约1个菌落形成单位(CFU)/平方厘米的最强黏液产生菌能够在香肠表面与接种水平为10⁷CFU/平方厘米的嗜酸乳杆菌有效竞争。这种市售生物防腐剂未能占据四种产生粘性黏液的清酒乳杆菌菌株的重要生态位,导致几乎所有包装都出现变质。