• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluating the options for developing databases to support research-based medicine at the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.

作者信息

Glanville J, Smith I

机构信息

NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Triton House, Liversedge, UK.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 1997 Nov;47(1-2):83-6. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00080-4.

DOI:10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00080-4
PMID:9506399
Abstract

The paper presents the results of a questionnaire survey and user interface review group experiments to determine the value and ease of use of the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) and the NHS Economic Evaluations Database (NEED). The results are interpreted with other recent studies of the use of electronic databases, including the NHS Research Register User Requirements Specification. The study found that most frequent users of the DARE database tend to use the CD-ROM version. Librarians were found to have the greatest awareness of the databases, with relatively low levels of use by operational NHS Staff. Untrained users found the online databases difficult to access and had erroneous perceptions of the database content which were only realised when queries returned unexpected answers. Experienced users of online information systems tended to want more sophisticated search facilities than inexperienced users. Nearly all users in the review groups wanted to access the databases in conjunction with other information sources, such as the Cochrane Library, Medline and the ACP Journal Club, highlighting the need for cross organisational strategies for the dissemination of research-based information.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluating the options for developing databases to support research-based medicine at the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
Int J Med Inform. 1997 Nov;47(1-2):83-6. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00080-4.
2
Transitioning to the Internet: results of a National Library of Medicine user survey.向互联网过渡:美国国立医学图书馆用户调查结果
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997 Oct;85(4):331-40.
3
Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.计算机决策支持系统在诊断、筛查或监测检验申请方面的交流应用:系统的效果和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(48):1-227. doi: 10.3310/hta14480.
4
Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). NHS CRD Review, Dissemination, and Information Teams.医疗保健干预措施的质量评估综述与有效性综述摘要数据库(DARE)。英国国家医疗服务体系循证医学中心综述、传播与信息团队。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Fall;15(4):671-8.
5
Survey on the use of information sources in the field of aging.老龄化领域信息来源使用情况调查
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994 Jan;82(1):30-5.
6
Evidence-based medicine: an opportunity for health sciences librarians.循证医学:健康科学图书馆员的一个机遇。
Med Ref Serv Q. 1996 Winter;15(4):63-71. doi: 10.1300/J115V15N04_06.
7
Accessing MEDLINE from the dental office.从牙科诊所访问医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)。
J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Apr;127(4):510-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0246.
8
Stepping out: the changing role of e-resources librarians.走出舒适区:电子资源馆员角色的转变
Health Info Libr J. 2006 Dec;23 Suppl 1:54-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00679.x.
9
10
MEDLINE: the options for health professionals.医学在线数据库:健康专业人员的选择
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Sep-Oct;1(5):372-80. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153425.