Amici R, Zamboni G, Perez E, Jones C A, Parmeggiani P L
Dipartimento di Fisiologia Umana e Generale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Brain Res. 1998 Jan 19;781(1-2):252-8. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01242-0.
This study was carried out in order to further test the hypothesis that the occurrence of REM sleep in the rat in the form of episodes separated by long intervals (single REM sleep episodes) and by short intervals (sequential REM sleep episodes) is differently influenced by changes in both sleep and ambient related processes. Rats were studied during the exposure to Ta -10 degrees C for 24 or 48 h and during a 12 h recovery period at laboratory Ta (23 degrees C) following either the first or the second 24 h of cold exposure. The exposure to such a low Ta induced an almost complete abolition of REM sleep which was followed, during recovery, by a marked REM sleep rebound. However, in spite of the larger REM sleep deprivation, the REM sleep rebound was weaker following the 48 h-exposure than that following the exposure for 24 h. The increase in the amount of REM sleep during the recovery period was due to an increase in the amount of that occurring in the form of sequential episodes, whilst that in the form of single episodes did not change with respect to control levels. However, the occurrence of REM sleep in the form of sequential episodes was partially impaired during the REM sleep rebound observed in the recovery period following the 48 h-exposure. These results would suggest that the homeostatic regulation of physiological variables may conflict with that of REM sleep occurrence and that the degree of such a contrast is indicated, at low Ta, by the amount of REM sleep in the form of single episodes and, during the following recovery, by the amount of REM sleep in the form of sequential episodes.
大鼠快速眼动睡眠(REM睡眠)以长间隔(单个REM睡眠发作)和短间隔(连续REM睡眠发作)分开的形式出现,会受到睡眠和环境相关过程变化的不同影响。在将大鼠暴露于10℃环境24或48小时期间以及在冷暴露的第一个或第二个24小时后的12小时实验室温度(23℃)恢复期对大鼠进行研究。暴露于如此低的温度会导致REM睡眠几乎完全消失,在恢复期间,随后会出现明显的REM睡眠反弹。然而,尽管REM睡眠剥夺程度更大,但48小时暴露后的REM睡眠反弹比24小时暴露后的要弱。恢复期REM睡眠量的增加是由于连续发作形式的REM睡眠量增加,而单个发作形式的REM睡眠量相对于对照水平没有变化。然而,在48小时暴露后的恢复期观察到的REM睡眠反弹期间,连续发作形式的REM睡眠出现受到部分损害。这些结果表明,生理变量的稳态调节可能与REM睡眠出现的调节相冲突,并且这种对比的程度在低温下由单个发作形式的REM睡眠量指示,而在随后的恢复期间由连续发作形式的REM睡眠量指示。