Suppr超能文献

获批的专业前实践项目的选拔标准:它们与饮食实习项目的选拔标准不同吗?

Selection criteria for approved preprofessional practice programs: are they different from those for dietetic internships?

作者信息

Sneed J, Carruth B R

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-1900.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Aug;91(8):950-3.

PMID:1894904
Abstract

Using a mailed questionnaire, we surveyed the directors of 41 approved preprofessional practice programs (AP4) listed in the Directory of Dietetic Programs 1990 and nine programs approved by The American Dietetic Association's Council on Education in December 1989 to determine the relative importance of admission criteria used to select students for AP4s. We compared the results of this study with those of an earlier survey of dietetic internship directors. The AP4 and dietetic internship directors gave significantly different importance ratings to elective courses in professional sciences and courses in the biological/physical sciences. Unlike dietetic internship directors, AP4 directors rated Graduate Record Examination (GRE) score highest (1.4 +/- 1.7 on a 10-point scale). AP4 directors' rating of grade point average (1.8 +/- 1.3) and professional courses (1.9 +/- 1.2) was similar to the internship directors' rating of these criteria (1.7 +/- 0.9 and 1.7 +/- 1.0, respectively). Results indicate that AP4 and internship directors seek similar qualities in students, but that GRE score is more important to AP4 directors. The AP4 directors' emphasis on GRE score may be explained, in part, by the fact that 76% (38 of 50) of these programs are affiliated with a university program, and of those 38 programs, 29 (88%) require graduate credit as a component of the AP4. These data are important to Plan IV/V faculty advisers because students may have misconceptions about differences in AP4 and internship selection criteria.

摘要

我们通过邮寄问卷的方式,对1990年《饮食学项目目录》中列出的41个获批的专业前实践项目(AP4)的负责人以及1989年12月美国饮食协会教育委员会批准的9个项目的负责人进行了调查,以确定用于选拔AP4项目学生的录取标准的相对重要性。我们将这项研究的结果与早期对饮食实习项目负责人的调查结果进行了比较。AP4项目和饮食实习项目的负责人对专业科学选修课和生物/物理科学课程的重要性评级存在显著差异。与饮食实习项目负责人不同,AP4项目负责人将研究生入学考试(GRE)成绩评为最重要(在10分制中为1.4 +/- 1.7)。AP4项目负责人对平均绩点(1.8 +/- 1.3)和专业课程(1.9 +/- 1.2)的评级与实习项目负责人对这些标准的评级相似(分别为1.7 +/- 0.9和1.7 +/- 1.0)。结果表明,AP4项目和实习项目负责人在学生身上寻求相似的品质,但GRE成绩对AP4项目负责人更为重要。AP4项目负责人对GRE成绩的重视,部分原因可能是这些项目中有76%(50个中的38个)与大学项目相关联,在这38个项目中,有29个(88%)要求研究生学分作为AP4的一部分。这些数据对计划IV/V的教师顾问很重要,因为学生可能对AP4和实习选拔标准的差异存在误解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验