To examine the effects of beak trimming on behaviour, beak anatomy, weight gain, food intake and feather condition 360 ISA Brown chicks were trimmed by hot cut or cold cut at 1 d or 10 d of age or were sham-operated controls. The experiment was a 3 x 2 factorial design, with the chicks housed in littered pens in groups of 10 and observed for 6 weeks after trimming. 2. In the first week after trimming, when trimmed birds were compared with untrimmed controls, they were less active (sat and slept more), fed less, preened less and generally engaged in less beak-related behaviour. 3. These differences waned sharply during week 2 and had disappeared by week 5. There were very few differences between hot- and cold-cut birds. 4. There were also differences in production variables: trimmed birds grew more slowly during the week after trimming, their food intake was depressed for 3 weeks and food conversion efficiency improved for 2 weeks. 5. The only significant effect on feather scores was better plumage condition in the groups trimmed at 1 d and scored at 6 weeks. 6. To examine the anatomical effects 36 ISA Brown chicks trimmed by hot or cold cut at 1 d or 10 d of age were killed at 21 and 42 d after trimming, and their beaks were processed and examined histologically. In all trimmed groups healing was very rapid and no scar tissue was seen but, unlike the controls, the regrown tips contained no afferent nerves or sensory corpuscles. 7. Beak lengths immediately after trimming were 40% to 50% shorter than controls; the anatomical consequences of both methods were identical. 8. Overall, it was judged that the effects on behaviour and beak anatomy were much less severe than previously reported for birds trimmed at older ages. If birds do have to be trimmed then the procedure should be carried out in young birds: from the birds' standpoint 1 d appears to be the most suitable.
