Werner R A, Franzblau A, Albers J W, Armstrong T J
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 1998 Apr;33(4):374-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199804)33:4<374::aid-ajim7>3.0.co;2-u.
The objective was to determine whether symptomatic workers with an abnormal sensory nerve conduction study consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome differed, in terms of electrophysiologic measures, psychosocial, demographic, anthropometric, or ergonomic variables, from workers with an asymptomatic median mononeuropathy. This was a cross-sectional study of active workers at six different work sites. Cases were defined as workers with electrodiagnostic findings of a median mononeuropathy in either hand, based on a 0.5-msec prolongation of the median sensory evoked peak latency compared to the ulnar latency. This group was stratified on the basis of symptoms of numbness, tingling, burning or pain in the hand. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic, anthropomorphic, psychosocial, electrophysiologic, and ergonomic risk factors. Active workers from six different sites were tested; five sites involved manufacturing workers, and one site represented clerical workers. One hundred eighty-four active workers with a median mononeuropathy were documented on nerve conduction studies. These workers represented a subset of more than 700 workers screened at six different locations. The main outcome measure was the patient's report of symptoms of pain, numbness, tingling or burning in the hand or fingers that lasted more than 1 week or occurred three or more times at the initial screening. Workers with a median mononeuropathy who complained of hand symptoms were more likely to be female, to have jobs with higher hand repetition levels, to have higher ratings of job security, not to have a history of diabetes, to use more force in their job with more abnormal postures of their wrist and fingers, and to have a trend toward a more prolonged median sensory distal latency. Most logistic regression models explained less than 15% of the variance (pseudo R2). Women with jobs that have higher ergonomic risks and no history of diabetes were more likely to have reported symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome compared to other workers with a documented median mononeuropathy. Psychosocial variables were not particularly discriminatory. None of the models allows enough precision to predict on an individual basis.
目的是确定感觉神经传导研究异常且符合腕管综合征的有症状工人,在电生理指标、心理社会、人口统计学、人体测量学或工效学变量方面,与无症状正中单神经病工人是否存在差异。这是一项对六个不同工作场所的在职工人进行的横断面研究。病例定义为根据正中感觉诱发电位峰值潜伏期比尺神经潜伏期延长0.5毫秒,电诊断显示单手存在正中单神经病的工人。该组根据手部麻木、刺痛、灼痛或疼痛症状进行分层。比较两组在人口统计学、人体测量学、心理社会、电生理和工效学风险因素方面的差异。对来自六个不同场所的在职工人进行了测试;五个场所的工人从事制造业,一个场所的工人是文职人员。神经传导研究记录了184例患有正中单神经病的在职工人。这些工人是在六个不同地点筛查的700多名工人中的一个子集。主要结局指标是患者报告手部或手指疼痛、麻木、刺痛或灼痛症状持续超过1周,或在初次筛查时出现三次或更多次。抱怨手部症状的正中单神经病工人更可能为女性,从事手部重复程度较高的工作,对工作安全性评价较高,无糖尿病史,工作中使用更多力量且手腕和手指姿势更异常,并且正中感觉远端潜伏期有延长趋势。大多数逻辑回归模型解释的方差不到15%(伪R2)。与其他记录有正中单神经病的工人相比,从事工效学风险较高工作且无糖尿病史的女性更可能报告与腕管综合征相关的症状。心理社会变量的区分度不高。没有一个模型具有足够的精度来进行个体预测。