• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿的时间估计:一种支配时间生成的初始力规则。

Time estimation in young children: an initial force rule governing time production.

作者信息

Droit-Volet S

机构信息

Blaise Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Mar;68(3):236-49. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1997.2430.

DOI:10.1006/jecp.1997.2430
PMID:9514772
Abstract

Children aged 3 and 5 1/2 years were asked to carry out a response duration task in two sessions under "minimal", "temporal" and "force" instructions. In session 1, they were told to press "long enough" for the temporal instructions and "hard enough" for the force instructions. In session 2, they were asked to press "longer" or "harder" than in the previous session. Results showed that the force instructions, but not the temporal instructions, improved the 3-year-olds' timing accuracy. Furthermore, when instructed to press harder, 3-year-olds pressed longer. In contrast, 5 1/2-year-olds were more accurate with the temporal than with the force instructions; and when asked to press harder, they did not press longer. These findings suggest that 3-year-olds rely on a certain amount of force to produce correct response durations. The marked dissociation between force and duration only emerges between the ages of 3 and 5 1/2.

摘要

3岁和5岁半的儿童被要求在“最小”“时间”和“力度”指示下分两个阶段完成一项反应持续时间任务。在第一阶段,对于时间指示,他们被告知要按压“足够长的时间”,对于力度指示,要按压“足够用力”。在第二阶段,要求他们比上一阶段按压得“更长”或“更用力”。结果显示,力度指示而非时间指示提高了3岁儿童的计时准确性。此外,当被指示更用力按压时,3岁儿童按压的时间更长。相比之下,5岁半的儿童在时间指示下比在力度指示下更准确;当被要求更用力按压时,他们按压的时间并没有变长。这些发现表明,3岁儿童依靠一定的力度来产生正确的反应持续时间。力度和持续时间之间明显的分离仅出现在3岁至5岁半之间。

相似文献

1
Time estimation in young children: an initial force rule governing time production.幼儿的时间估计:一种支配时间生成的初始力规则。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Mar;68(3):236-49. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1997.2430.
2
Scalar timing in temporal generalization in children with short and long stimulus durations.短刺激时长和长刺激时长儿童时间泛化中的标量计时
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1193-209. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000161.
3
Development of time quantification: integration and nonintegration of beginnings and endings in comparing durations.
Child Dev. 1984 Dec;55(6):2160-72.
4
A further analysis of time bisection behavior in children with and without reference memory: the similarity and the partition task.对有和没有参照记忆的儿童时间二等分行为的进一步分析:相似性和划分任务。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jun;125(2):240-56. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
5
Cognitive control of sequential knowledge in 2-year-olds: evidence from an incidental sequence-learning and -generation task.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):261-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01886.x.
6
Temporal bisection in children.儿童的时间二分法。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Oct;80(2):142-59. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2001.2631.
7
Cognitive abilities explaining age-related changes in time perception of short and long durations.认知能力解释了短时间和长时间感知随年龄变化的原因。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jun;109(2):143-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
8
Young children's awareness of their mental activity: the case of mental rotation.幼儿对其心理活动的认知:心理旋转的案例
Child Dev. 1998 Oct;69(5):1345-60.
9
Children's recognition of time in the causes and cures of physical and emotional reactions to illnesses and injuries.儿童对疾病和伤痛的身体及情绪反应的原因及治疗中时间的认知。
Br J Psychol. 2007 Aug;98(Pt 3):389-410. doi: 10.1348/000712606X147790.
10
Short-term memory for time in children and adults: A behavioral study and a model.儿童和成人对时间的短期记忆:一项行为研究及模型
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Aug;97(4):246-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a neurodevelopmental cognitive perspective of temporal processing.朝向时间加工的神经发育认知观点。
Commun Biol. 2024 Aug 14;7(1):987. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06641-4.
2
Development and relationship between the judgment of the speed of passage of time and the judgment of duration in children.儿童对时间流逝速度的判断与对时长的判断之间的发展及关系。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1160047. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160047. eCollection 2023.
3
Children and adults rely on different heuristics for estimation of durations.
儿童和成人在估计时间长度时依赖不同的启发式策略。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):1077. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27419-4.
4
A Mental Timeline for Duration From the Age of 5 Years Old.从5岁起的持续时间的心理时间线。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 10;9:1155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01155. eCollection 2018.
5
Developmental emergence of fear/threat learning: neurobiology, associations and timing.恐惧/威胁学习的发育出现:神经生物学、关联及时间
Genes Brain Behav. 2016 Jan;15(1):144-54. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12261. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
6
Motor activity improves temporal expectancy.运动活动改善时间预期。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0119187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119187. eCollection 2015.
7
Developmental neuroscience of time and number: implications for autism and other neurodevelopmental disabilities.时间和数量的发展神经科学:对自闭症和其他神经发育障碍的影响。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Mar 6;6:7. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00007. eCollection 2011 Oct 14.
8
The time-emotion paradox.时间-情感悖论
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1943-53. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0013.