Selim A J, Ren X S, Fincke G, Deyo R A, Rogers W, Miller D, Linzer M, Kazis L
Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Massachusetts, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Feb 15;23(4):470-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199802150-00013.
Cross-sectional data were analyzed from the Veterans Health Study, an observational study of patients receiving ambulatory care.
To develop a method of stratifying patients with low back pain by combining patient reports of radiating leg pain with the results of straight leg raising tests.
Four hundred thirty-four participants with low back pain were identified through patient reports of ever having had low back pain, of low back pain that began more than 3 months ago, and of a health-care visit for low back pain in the past year. Four hundred twenty-eight patients with low back pain were included in the current analysis.
Participants were mailed a health-related quality of life questionnaire and had an interview that included a low back pain questionnaire and a straight leg raising test. Patients' reports of radiating leg pain and results of the straight leg raising tests were combined into four hierarchical groups. This stratification was evaluated in relation to responses to the health-related quality of life questionnaire, localized low back pain, disability, and use of medical services.
The intensity of localized low back pain and disability increased from Group 1 (low back pain alone) to Group 4 (pain below knee with positive straight leg raising test result), whereas health-related quality of life decreased. Group 4 patients were 5.1 times more likely than were Group 1 patients to use medications for low back pain (95% confidence interval 1.2, 22.9), 6.8 times more likely to have a spinal magnetic resonance study (95% confidence interval, 2.7, 17.2), and 3.9 times more likely to have surgery (95% confidence interval, 1.3, 11.4).
The method of measuring correlation performs well in identifying patients with different levels of localized low back pain intensity, health-related quality of life, and use of services. It may be useful in studies of health outcomes, in clinical trials, and in predicting demands on health care resources.
对退伍军人健康研究中的横断面数据进行分析,该研究是一项针对接受门诊护理患者的观察性研究。
通过将腿部放射性疼痛的患者报告与直腿抬高试验结果相结合,开发一种对腰痛患者进行分层的方法。
通过患者报告曾患腰痛、3个多月前开始的腰痛以及过去一年因腰痛进行的医疗就诊,确定了434名腰痛参与者。本分析纳入了428名腰痛患者。
向参与者邮寄一份与健康相关的生活质量问卷,并进行一次访谈,其中包括一份腰痛问卷和直腿抬高试验。患者的腿部放射性疼痛报告和直腿抬高试验结果被合并为四个分层组。根据对与健康相关的生活质量问卷的回答、局部腰痛、残疾情况以及医疗服务的使用情况对这种分层进行评估。
从第1组(仅腰痛)到第4组(膝以下疼痛且直腿抬高试验结果为阳性),局部腰痛的强度和残疾程度增加,而与健康相关的生活质量下降。第4组患者使用腰痛药物的可能性比第1组患者高5.1倍(95%置信区间1.2, 22.9),进行脊柱磁共振检查的可能性高6.8倍(95%置信区间,2.7, 17.2),接受手术的可能性高3.9倍(95%置信区间,1.3, 11.4)。
这种测量相关性的方法在识别具有不同程度局部腰痛强度、与健康相关的生活质量和服务使用情况的患者方面表现良好。它可能在健康结果研究、临床试验以及预测医疗资源需求方面有用。