Meigs J B, Nathan D M, Wilson P W, Cupples L A, Singer D E
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston University School of Public Health, 02114, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 1;128(7):524-33. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-7-199804010-00002.
Categorical definitions for glucose intolerance imply that risk thresholds exist, but metabolic risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular disease may increase continuously as glucose intolerance increases.
To examine the distributions of the following metabolic risk factors across the spectrum of glucose tolerance: overall and central obesity, hypertension, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increased triglyceride and insulin levels.
Cross-sectional analysis.
The community-based Framingham Offspring Study.
2583 adults without previously diagnosed diabetes.
Clinical data; fasting glucose, insulin, and lipid levels; and glucose and insulin levels taken 2 hours after oral challenge were collected from 1991 to 1993. Glucose tolerance was determined by 1980 World Health Organization criteria. Patients with normal glucose tolerance were categorized into quintiles of fasting glucose. The distributions of each metabolic risk factor and the metabolic sum of the six risk factors were assessed across seven categories from the lowest quintile of normal fasting glucose level through impaired glucose tolerance and previously undiagnosed diabetes.
The mean age of patients was 54 years (range, 26 to 82 years); 52.7% of patients were women. Glucose tolerance testing found that 12.7% of patients had impaired glucose tolerance and 4.8% had previously undiagnosed diabetes. Multivariable-adjusted mean measures of risk factors and odds ratios for obesity, elevated waist-to-hip ratio, hypertension, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated triglyceride levels, and hyperinsulinemia showed continuous increases across the spectrum of nondiabetic glucose tolerance. Although a threshold effect near the upper range of nondiabetic glucose tolerance could not be ruled out for triglyceride levels in men and for insulin levels 2 hours after oral challenge in men and women, no other metabolic risk factors showed clear evidence of thresholds for increased risk.
Metabolic risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus and for cardiovascular disease worsen continuously across the spectrum of glucose tolerance categories, beginning in the lowest quintiles of normal fasting glucose level.
葡萄糖耐量的分类定义意味着存在风险阈值,但随着葡萄糖耐量增加,2型糖尿病或心血管疾病的代谢风险可能会持续上升。
研究以下代谢风险因素在葡萄糖耐量范围内的分布情况:总体肥胖和中心性肥胖、高血压、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低、甘油三酯和胰岛素水平升高。
横断面分析。
基于社区的弗雷明汉后代研究。
2583名既往未诊断糖尿病的成年人。
收集1991年至1993年的临床数据、空腹血糖、胰岛素和血脂水平,以及口服葡萄糖耐量试验2小时后的血糖和胰岛素水平。根据1980年世界卫生组织标准确定葡萄糖耐量。葡萄糖耐量正常的患者按空腹血糖水平分为五分位数。评估从空腹血糖正常最低五分位数到糖耐量受损及既往未诊断糖尿病的七个类别中各代谢风险因素的分布情况以及六个风险因素的代谢总和。
患者的平均年龄为54岁(范围26至82岁);52.7%为女性。葡萄糖耐量试验发现,12.7%的患者糖耐量受损,4.8%的患者既往有未诊断的糖尿病。多变量调整后的风险因素均值测量以及肥胖、腰臀比升高、高血压、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低、甘油三酯水平升高和高胰岛素血症的比值比在非糖尿病葡萄糖耐量范围内持续增加。尽管不能排除男性甘油三酯水平以及男性和女性口服葡萄糖耐量试验2小时后胰岛素水平在非糖尿病葡萄糖耐量上限附近存在阈值效应,但没有其他代谢风险因素显示出风险增加的明确阈值证据。
2型糖尿病和心血管疾病的代谢风险因素在葡萄糖耐量类别范围内持续恶化,从空腹血糖正常的最低五分位数开始。