Suppr超能文献

肱骨骨干骨折的手术治疗。钢板与髓内钉的比较。

Operative management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Plate versus nail.

作者信息

Modabber M R, Jupiter J B

机构信息

Orthopaedic Hand Surgical Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02115, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Feb(347):93-104.

PMID:9520879
Abstract

Although nonoperative treatment is indicated and successful for the majority of diaphyseal humeral fractures, operative intervention is indicated in several situations. Either intramedullary nail or plate fixation commonly is used for the operative management of this problem. Familiarity with the surgical techniques and application of both types (and subtypes) of implants is necessary to allow optimal treatment for the widest range of fracture patterns. In most indications for operative management, internal fixation with plates is preferred. Stable fixation, sparing adjacent joints from iatrogenic injuries, and direct visualization and protection of the radial nerve are of critical importance in maximizing postoperative function and in most cases outweight the potential advantages of a loadsharing implant inserted through a more limited incision.

摘要

虽然非手术治疗适用于大多数肱骨干骨折且成功率较高,但在某些情况下仍需进行手术干预。髓内钉或钢板固定通常用于该问题的手术治疗。熟悉这两种类型(及其亚型)植入物的手术技术和应用,对于针对最广泛的骨折类型进行最佳治疗是必要的。在大多数手术治疗适应症中,钢板内固定是首选。稳定固定、避免相邻关节受到医源性损伤以及直接可视化和保护桡神经,对于最大化术后功能至关重要,并且在大多数情况下,其重要性超过了通过更有限切口插入的负载分担植入物的潜在优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验