Cassel J C, Cassel S, Galani R, Kelche C, Will B, Jarrard L
Université Louis Pasteur, 12 rue Goethe, Strasbourg, France.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1998 Jan;69(1):22-45. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1997.3807.
The behavioral effects of interrupting the axons that pass in the fimbria and dorsal fornix were compared with the effects of selective removal of the cells that comprise the hippocampus with ibotenic acid. Starting 4.5 months after surgery, lesioned and control rats were (i) trained in both the Morris water maze and the eight-arm radial maze using protocols that placed an emphasis on either working memory (WM) or reference memory (RM) and (ii) tested for locomotor activity in the home cage. In comparison to sham-operated rats, the rats from both lesion groups were impaired in most learning/memory tasks, but there were some interesting differences between the two lesioned groups. When compared to rats with fimbria-fornix lesions (FIFX rats), hippocampal rats (HIPP rats) were slower in learning to swim to a visible platform and showed a greater impairment than FIFX rats in the radial-maze task when the testing procedure required the utilization of RM and WM in a more demanding WM task. In the test of locomotor activity, FIFX and control rats did not differ, but HIPP rats were more active than the rats in both other groups. The pattern of results obtained after a 4.5-month recovery period support the following general conclusions. (1) While there are some similarities in the effects on behavior of interrupting the axons in the fimbria-fornix compared to removing the hippocampus, there are some important differences. (2) From the findings that are available, a possible explanation to account for the difference between FIFX and HIPP rats is that the 4.5-month survival time permitted some recovery in the group of rats with FIFX lesions. (3) While it is well known that the Morris water maze and the radial-arm maze tasks provide useful measures of spatial learning and memory processes, our results suggest that the information provided by the two spatial learning tasks may differ in important respects.
将通过穹窿和背侧穹窿的轴突切断所产生的行为效应,与用鹅膏蕈氨酸选择性去除构成海马体的细胞所产生的效应进行了比较。在手术后4.5个月开始,对损伤组和对照组大鼠进行如下实验:(i) 使用强调工作记忆(WM)或参考记忆(RM)的方案,在莫里斯水迷宫和八臂放射状迷宫中进行训练;(ii) 在饲养笼中测试其运动活性。与假手术组大鼠相比,两个损伤组的大鼠在大多数学习/记忆任务中均受损,但两个损伤组之间存在一些有趣的差异。与穹窿-穹窿损伤大鼠(FIFX大鼠)相比,海马体损伤大鼠(HIPP大鼠)在学习游向可见平台时速度较慢,并且在测试程序要求在更具挑战性的WM任务中同时利用RM和WM的放射状迷宫任务中,比FIFX大鼠表现出更大的损伤。在运动活性测试中,FIFX大鼠和对照组大鼠没有差异,但HIPP大鼠比其他两组大鼠更活跃。4.5个月恢复期后获得的结果模式支持以下一般结论。(1) 虽然切断穹窿-穹窿中的轴突与切除海马体对行为的影响存在一些相似之处,但也存在一些重要差异。(2) 根据现有研究结果,对FIFX大鼠和HIPP大鼠之间差异的一种可能解释是,4.5个月的存活时间使FIFX损伤大鼠组有了一定程度的恢复。(3) 虽然众所周知,莫里斯水迷宫和放射状臂迷宫任务为空间学习和记忆过程提供了有用的测量方法,但我们的结果表明,这两个空间学习任务所提供的信息在重要方面可能存在差异。