Lieu T A, Capra A M, Makol J, Black S B, Shinefield H R
Division of Research, Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA 94611, USA.
Pediatrics. 1998 Apr;101(4):E3. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.4.e3.
Immunization rates have improved in the United States, but are still far from the national 90% goal for the year 2000. There is scant evidence about the effectiveness and costs of automated telephone messages to improve immunization rates among privately insured children.
To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sending letters, automated telephone messages, or both to families of underimmunized 20-month-olds in a health maintenance organization (HMO).
In this randomized trial, underimmunized 20-month-olds identified by the HMO's computerized immunization tracking system were assigned to one of four interventions: 1) an automated telephone message alone; 2) a letter alone; 3) an automated telephone message followed by a letter 1 week later; and 4) a letter followed by an automated telephone message 1 week later. The primary outcome was receipt of any needed immunization by 24 months of age. Decision analysis was used to evaluate the projected cost-effectiveness of the alternative strategies.
A total of 648 children were randomized. A letter followed by a telephone message (58% immunized) was significantly better than either a letter alone (44% immunized) or a telephone message alone (44% immunized). A telephone message followed by a letter (53% immunized) also was more effective than either alone, although the differences were not statistically significant. Among a similar comparison group that received no systematic intervention, 36% were immunized. The estimated cost per child immunized was $7.00 using letters followed by automated telephone messages, $9.80 using automated telephone messages alone, and $10.50 using letters alone. Under alternative cost assumptions for automated telephone messages and mailed messages, the cost per child immunized ranged from $2.20 to $6.50.
For underimmunized 20-month-olds in this HMO setting, letters followed by automated telephone messages were more effective and cost-effective than either message alone. The cost-effectiveness of automated telephone messages and letters may vary widely depending on the setting, and choices among strategies should be tailored to the populations being served.
美国的免疫接种率有所提高,但仍远未达到2000年全国90%的目标。关于自动电话信息提高私人保险儿童免疫接种率的有效性和成本,证据很少。
评估向健康维护组织(HMO)中未充分接种疫苗的20个月大儿童的家庭发送信件、自动电话信息或两者兼有的有效性和成本效益。
在这项随机试验中,通过HMO的计算机免疫接种跟踪系统识别出的未充分接种疫苗的20个月大儿童被分配到四种干预措施之一:1)仅自动电话信息;2)仅信件;3)自动电话信息后1周再发信件;4)信件后1周再发自动电话信息。主要结局是在24个月龄时接受任何所需的免疫接种。决策分析用于评估替代策略的预计成本效益。
共有648名儿童被随机分组。先信件后电话信息(58%接种)明显优于仅信件(44%接种)或仅电话信息(44%接种)。先电话信息后信件(53%接种)也比单独使用任何一种更有效,尽管差异无统计学意义。在未接受系统干预的类似比较组中,36%的儿童接种了疫苗。使用先信件后自动电话信息的方式,每接种一名儿童的估计成本为7.00美元,仅使用自动电话信息为9.80美元,仅使用信件为10.50美元。在自动电话信息和邮寄信件的替代成本假设下,每接种一名儿童的成本在2.20美元至6.50美元之间。
对于该HMO环境中未充分接种疫苗的20个月大儿童,先信件后自动电话信息比单独使用任何一种信息更有效且更具成本效益。自动电话信息和信件的成本效益可能因环境而异,策略选择应根据所服务的人群进行调整。