Baker A M, McCarthy B, Gurley V F, Yood M U
Center for Clinical Effectiveness, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich 48202, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jul;13(7):469-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00136.x.
To compare the effects of different types of computer-generated, mailed reminders on the rate of influenza immunization and to analyze the relative cost-effectiveness of the reminders.
Randomized controlled trial.
Multispecialty group practice.
We studied 24,743 high-risk adult patients aligned with a primary care physician.
Patients were randomized to one of four interventions: (1) no reminder, which served as control; (2) a generic postcard; (3) a personalized postcard from their physician; and (4) a personalized letter from their physician, tailored to their health risk.
The immunization rate was measured using billing data. A telephone survey was conducted in a subgroup of patients to measure reactions to the mailed reminders. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness, a model was constructed that integrated the observed effect of the interventions with published data on the effect of immunization on future inpatient health care costs.
All three of the reminders studied increased the influenza vaccination rate when compared with the control group. The vaccination rate was 40.6% in the control group, 43.5% in the generic postcard group, 44.7% in the personalized postcard group, and 45.2% in the tailored letter group. The rates of immunization increased as the intensity of the intervention increased (p < .0001). Seventy-eight percent of patients in the letter group deemed the intervention useful, and 86% reported that they would like to get reminders in the future. The cost-effectiveness analysis estimated that in a nonepidemic year, the net savings per 100 reminders sent would be $659 for the personalized postcard intervention and $735 for the tailored letter intervention. When these net cost-savings rates were each applied to the entire high-risk cohort of 24,743 patients, the estimated total net savings was $162,940 for the postcard and $181,858 for the tailored letter.
Although the absolute increase in immunization rates with the use of reminders appeared small, the increases translated into substantial cost savings when applied to a large high-risk population. Personalized reminders were somewhat more effective in increasing immunization, and personalized letters tailored to the patients' condition were deemed useful and important by the individuals who received them and had a beneficial indirect effect on patient satisfaction.
比较不同类型的计算机生成邮寄提醒对流感疫苗接种率的影响,并分析这些提醒的相对成本效益。
随机对照试验。
多专科团体诊所。
我们研究了24743名与初级保健医生合作的高危成年患者。
患者被随机分为四种干预措施之一:(1)无提醒,作为对照组;(2)普通明信片;(3)医生的个性化明信片;(4)医生根据患者健康风险定制的个性化信件。
使用计费数据测量疫苗接种率。对一组患者进行电话调查,以测量他们对邮寄提醒的反应。为评估成本效益,构建了一个模型,将干预措施的观察效果与已发表的关于疫苗接种对未来住院医疗费用影响的数据相结合。
与对照组相比,所研究的三种提醒方式均提高了流感疫苗接种率。对照组的接种率为40.6%,普通明信片组为43.5%,个性化明信片组为44.7%,定制信件组为45.2%。随着干预强度的增加,接种率也随之提高(p < .0001)。信件组中78%的患者认为干预措施有用,86%的患者表示他们希望未来能收到提醒。成本效益分析估计,在非流行年份,每发送100次提醒,个性化明信片干预措施的净节省成本为659美元,定制信件干预措施为735美元。当将这些净成本节省率应用于24743名高危患者的整个队列时,明信片的估计总净节省成本为162940美元,定制信件为181858美元。
虽然使用提醒方式使疫苗接种率的绝对增幅似乎较小,但应用于大量高危人群时,这些增幅转化为了可观的成本节省。个性化提醒在提高疫苗接种率方面略为有效,根据患者病情定制的个性化信件被收件人认为有用且重要,并对患者满意度产生了有益的间接影响。