• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Data management in olfaction studies.

作者信息

Chastrette M

机构信息

Laboratoire de Chimie Organique Physique, UMR 5622-CNRS, Université Lyon I, Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1998;8(3-4):157-81. doi: 10.1080/10629369808039139.

DOI:10.1080/10629369808039139
PMID:9522474
Abstract

Problems arising in the collection of data in olfaction studies are discussed in relation with the specific nature of perception and description of odors. Olfactory data depend strongly on individual physiological differences, on measurement methods and on psychological factors. Classifications of odors are necessary to put some order in odor descriptions which are used in structure-odor relationships. Published classifications have been based on empirical, semi-empirical, or statistical approaches. In the last category data may be obtained using semantic descriptions, or profiles, or similarity estimations. Examples of each kind of classification are presented and discussed. The intensity data are most often threshold data. They also present a huge variability which makes it difficult to relate them to physicochemical properties. Data on thresholds and attempts to standardize them are presented and discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Data management in olfaction studies.
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1998;8(3-4):157-81. doi: 10.1080/10629369808039139.
2
[Psychological classification and significance of odors].[气味的心理学分类及意义]
Z Exp Angew Psychol. 1990;37(4):608-22.
3
A Sensory 3D Map of the Odor Description Space Derived from a Comparison of Numeric Odor Profile Databases.基于数字气味特征数据库比较得出的气味描述空间的感官三维图谱。
Chem Senses. 2015 Jun;40(5):305-13. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv012. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
4
Identification of latent variables in a semantic odor profile database using principal component analysis.使用主成分分析在语义气味特征数据库中识别潜在变量。
Chem Senses. 2006 Oct;31(8):713-24. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjl013. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
5
Odor classification: a review of factors influencing perception-based odor arrangements.气味分类:影响基于感知的气味排列因素综述。
Chem Senses. 2013 Mar;38(3):189-209. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs141. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
6
The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors.气味的语言:连接气味描述符的语言和心理物理属性。
Cognition. 2018 Sep;178:37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 12.
7
Semantic-free scaling of odor quality.气味品质的无语义标度
Physiol Behav. 1996 Jul;60(1):211-5. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(96)00019-4.
8
[Impact of odor hedonics on sensory odor intensity--physiological intensity and sensory intensity].[气味享乐主义对感官气味强度——生理强度和感官强度的影响]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1989 Dec;44(5):1002-8. doi: 10.1265/jjh.44.1002.
9
Trends in structure-odor relationships.
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1997;6(3-4):215-54. doi: 10.1080/10629369708033253.
10
[Inducibility of olfactory sensitivity by odor exposure of persons with specific anosmia].[特定嗅觉缺失者气味暴露对嗅觉敏感性的诱导作用]
Z Exp Psychol. 1999;46(1):53-9.