Tarim B, Suzuki S, Suzuki S, Cox C F
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Turkey.
Am J Dent. 1996 Apr;9(2):72-6.
To evaluate the marginal integrity of amalgam restorations in association with four different bonding agents in an in vitro stressing system.
Cylindrical cavities were prepared in extracted human molars. The enamel-dentin interface of each cavity was treated with one of four different bonding agents and a non-bonded group. Following treatment with one of the four systems; Amalgambond (AB), Amalgambond Plus (AP) Superbond D-liner II (SD) and Bond-It (BI). Each cavity was then restored with a high-copper spherical amalgam alloy Tytin (TY). Using a load of 75 Newtons (N), a total of 100,000 cycles were applied to each restoration surface. Marginal integrity of each tooth restoration interface was replicated with epoxy and evaluated for gap width with a profilometer and SEM.
There were no significant differences in gap width between the loaded and unloaded groups. The non-bonded group (before loading) was statistically different than AB, AP, and SD. In addition, there were no significant differences among the 4-META bonded groups, regardless of the type of bond system, whether loaded or unloaded. The four different bonding agents were significantly different after loading than the non-bonded group. Our SEM and profilometry data demonstrate that the marginal integrity of amalgam alloy restorations is significantly improved by use of bonding systems.
在体外应力系统中评估汞合金修复体与四种不同粘结剂结合时的边缘完整性。
在拔除的人类磨牙上制备圆柱形洞形。每个洞形的釉质-牙本质界面用四种不同粘结剂之一及一个未粘结组进行处理。在用四种系统之一处理后;即Amalgambond(AB)、Amalgambond Plus(AP)、Superbond D-liner II(SD)和Bond-It(BI)。然后每个洞形用高铜球形汞合金合金Tytin(TY)进行修复。对每个修复体表面施加75牛顿(N)的载荷,总共施加100,000次循环。每个牙齿修复体界面的边缘完整性用环氧树脂复制,并用轮廓仪和扫描电子显微镜评估间隙宽度。
加载组和未加载组之间的间隙宽度没有显著差异。未粘结组(加载前)与AB、AP和SD在统计学上有差异。此外,无论粘结系统类型如何,加载或未加载时,4-META粘结组之间没有显著差异。加载后,四种不同的粘结剂与未粘结组相比有显著差异。我们的扫描电子显微镜和轮廓测量数据表明,使用粘结系统可显著改善汞合金合金修复体的边缘完整性。