Search for evidence of effective health promotion. Quantitative outcome evaluation with qualitative process evaluation is best.
作者信息
Britton A, Thorogood M, Coombes Y, Lewando-Hundt G
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):703-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.703a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Search for evidence of effective health promotion. Quantitative outcome evaluation with qualitative process evaluation is best.寻找有效健康促进的证据。最好采用定量结果评估与定性过程评估相结合的方式。
BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):703-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.703a.
2
Evidence base in health promotion: why bother?健康促进中的循证依据：为何要费心？
Soz Praventivmed. 2003;48(5):277-8. doi: 10.1007/s00038-003-3029-z.
3
Contextual evidence in clinical medicine and health promotion.临床医学与健康促进中的背景证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;18(6):548-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn082. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
4
[Evidence-based health promotion and prevention in settings: which types of study designs are needed?].[基于证据的环境健康促进与预防：需要哪些类型的研究设计？]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
5
The limitations of 'evidence-based' public health.“循证”公共卫生的局限性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Jun;12(3):319-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00600.x.
6
The evidence debate broadens: three examples.证据之争范围扩大：三个例子。
Soz Praventivmed. 2003;48(5):275-6. doi: 10.1007/s00038-003-3097-0.
7
Evidence-based medicine in traditional Chinese medicine: collision and combination.中医循证医学：碰撞与融合
J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Oct;14(8):893-4. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0266.
8
Recruitment and consent of women with intellectual disabilities in a randomised control trial of a health promotion intervention.智力残疾女性参与健康促进干预随机对照试验的招募和同意。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 May;55(5):474-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01399.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
9
[I Brazilian Guidelines for cardiovascular prevention].[巴西心血管疾病预防指南]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Dec;101(6 Suppl 2):1-63. doi: 10.5935/abc.2013S012.
10
Wellness programs: a review of the evidence.健康促进计划：证据综述
CMAJ. 1998 Jan 27;158(2):224-30.
引用本文的文献
1
In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research.为健康促进研究中的随机对照试验辩护。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1181-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061713. Epub 2006 May 30.
2
Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines.在临床实践指南中运用社会经济证据。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1283-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1283.
3
Evaluating health promotion is complex.评估健康促进工作是复杂的。
BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1463.
本文引用的文献
1
The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice.
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):247-51. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.247.
2
The search for evidence of effective health promotion.寻找有效健康促进的证据。
BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):361-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7104.361.
3
The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs.采用真实验设计评估计划生育项目的效果。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Apr;87(4):666-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.4.666.
4
The Eating Patterns Study--the importance of practical randomized trials in communities.饮食模式研究——社区中实用随机试验的重要性。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Apr;87(4):541-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.4.541.
5
Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.患者偏好与随机临床试验。
BMJ. 1989 Jul 29;299(6694):313-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6694.313.
Zotero 插件