• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智力残疾女性参与健康促进干预随机对照试验的招募和同意。

Recruitment and consent of women with intellectual disabilities in a randomised control trial of a health promotion intervention.

机构信息

School of Social Work, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 May;55(5):474-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01399.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01399.x
PMID:21385259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for evidence-based health promotion interventions for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities is critical. However, significant barriers impede them from participating in research, including those related to recruitment and obtaining informed consent.

METHODS

This study describes a procedure for the recruitment and consent of women with intellectual disabilities into a community-based, multi-site randomised controlled trial.

RESULTS

Of 269 women who participated in information sessions, 203 (75%) enrolled in the study. While women with and without legal guardians consented at the same approximate rates (83% and 85%, respectively), those with legal guardians enrolled at significantly lower rates (61%) because of lower rates (74%) of guardian consent.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to recruit community-dwelling women with intellectual disabilities into randomised controlled trials at relatively high participation rates. Recruiting women who have guardians poses additional challenges for researchers.

摘要

背景

为智力和发育障碍的女性提供循证健康促进干预措施的需求至关重要。然而,包括招募和获得知情同意在内的各种障碍严重阻碍了她们参与研究。

方法

本研究描述了一种将智力障碍女性招募并纳入基于社区的多地点随机对照试验的程序。

结果

在参加信息会议的 269 名女性中,有 203 名(75%)入组研究。虽然有和没有法定监护人的女性同意参与研究的比例大致相同(分别为 83%和 85%),但有法定监护人的女性入组率明显较低(61%),因为监护人同意的比例较低(74%)。

结论

有可能以较高的参与率招募到智力障碍的社区居住女性参与随机对照试验。招募有监护人的女性对研究人员来说提出了额外的挑战。

相似文献

1
Recruitment and consent of women with intellectual disabilities in a randomised control trial of a health promotion intervention.智力残疾女性参与健康促进干预随机对照试验的招募和同意。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 May;55(5):474-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01399.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
2
Por La Vida intervention model for cancer prevention in Latinas.拉丁裔女性癌症预防的“为了生命”干预模型
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995(18):137-45.
3
Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.科罗拉多州医疗专业人员对西班牙裔女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的态度。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995(18):95-100.
4
Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.对1991 - 1993年针对布拉德福德少数族裔女性进行乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的一项试点研究的评估;一种社区发展方法
Br J Cancer Suppl. 1996 Sep;29:S42-6.
5
Community level cancer control in a Texas barrio: Part II--Base-line and preliminary outcome findings.德克萨斯州一个西班牙裔聚居区的社区层面癌症控制:第二部分——基线及初步结果发现
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995(18):123-6.
6
Health messages reach women through netball.健康信息通过无挡板篮球运动传递给女性。
Nurs N Z. 2004;10(11):15.
7
Papanicolaou smear screening of women with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Taiwan.智障妇女巴氏涂片筛查:台湾的横断面调查。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
8
The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women's Health.英联邦基金会1998年女性健康调查。
Womens Health Issues. 2000 Jan-Feb;10(1):35-8.
9
Perception and experience of primary care physicians on Pap smear screening for women with intellectual disabilities: a preliminary finding.智障妇女巴氏涂片筛查的初级保健医生的认知和经验:初步发现。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):440-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
10
Recommendations for client- and provider-directed interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.关于由客户和提供者主导的干预措施的建议,以增加乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences with and Perceptions of the Child Welfare System During the Perinatal Period of Mothers with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.智力和发育障碍母亲围产期儿童福利系统的经历与认知
J Public Child Welf. 2025;19(4):751-773. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2024.2362685. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
A Scoping Review of the Ways Gatekeepers May Hinder or Promote Opportunities for People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities to Learn About Research Participation.关于把关人可能阻碍或促进智力和/或发育障碍者了解研究参与机会方式的范围综述
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 May;69(5):329-344. doi: 10.1111/jir.13216. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3
A Comparative Case Study of Hospice and Hospital End-of-Life Care for Aging Adults With Developmental Disabilities.
发育障碍老年患者临终关怀与医院临终护理的比较案例研究
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2022 May 11;9:23333936221087626. doi: 10.1177/23333936221087626. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Young people with intellectual disability and the internet: Challenges and opportunities in qualitative research.年轻人智力残疾和互联网:定性研究的挑战和机遇。
J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Sep;27(3):598-612. doi: 10.1177/17446295221095714. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
A survey study of the attitudes and experiences of adults with intellectual disability regarding participation in research.一项关于成年智障人士参与研究的态度和经验的调查研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Oct;65(10):941-948. doi: 10.1111/jir.12877. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Recruiting and Retaining People With Disabilities for Qualitative Health Research: Challenges and Solutions.招募和留住残疾人士参与定性健康研究:挑战与解决方案。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1056-1064. doi: 10.1177/1049732319833361. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
7
A Digital Health App to Assess Decisional Capacity to Provide Informed Consent: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一款用于评估知情同意决策能力的数字健康应用程序:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 19;7(11):e10360. doi: 10.2196/10360.
8
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.提高随机试验招募率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.
9
A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?一项关于成年人智力残疾者参与研究的态度的定量研究:利益相关者是否达成一致?
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
Parent ratings of ability to consent for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.脆性X综合征患者临床试验同意能力的家长评定
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):18-28. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540591.