Spatt J, Goldenberg G
Department for Neurology, Neurological Hospital Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Dec;19(6):850-6. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403765.
We used a reaction time paradigm to explore the relationship between motor execution and apraxia. The task required reaching for one to three keys. The instruction was varied by introducing a model of a hand indicating which fingers to use. Whereas patients with right-brain damage were slower than controls regardless of condition, the performance of patients with left-brain damage was only impaired when movements had to be carried out according to the model. Although this indicates a deficit in movement planning, there was no correlation between the impairment of patients with left-brain damage and clinical manifestations of apraxia. It thus remains an open question whether the impairment reflects an aspect of motor dominance of the left hemisphere that is too subtle to be detected by clinical apraxia testing, or whether it is related to task demands outside the domain of motor control. In any case, the results of this study demonstrate the need to control cognitive task demands when exploring motor capabilities of patients with left-brain damage.
我们采用反应时间范式来探究运动执行与失用症之间的关系。该任务要求伸手去按一到三个按键。通过引入一只手的模型来指示使用哪些手指,指令会有所变化。尽管无论何种情况,右脑损伤患者都比对照组慢,但只有在必须根据模型进行动作时,左脑损伤患者的表现才会受损。虽然这表明存在运动计划缺陷,但左脑损伤患者的损伤与失用症的临床表现之间并无关联。因此,这一损伤是反映了左半球运动优势中过于细微以至于临床失用症测试无法检测到的一个方面,还是与运动控制领域之外的任务需求有关,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。无论如何,本研究结果表明,在探究左脑损伤患者的运动能力时,需要控制认知任务需求。