Schnider A, Hanlon R E, Alexander D N, Benson D F
Department of Neurology, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, USA.
Brain Lang. 1997 Jun 1;58(1):125-36. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1770.
Ideomotor apraxia, disordered movement execution to command, commonly follows left-hemisphere damage, implying left-hemisphere dominance for certain kinds of movements. To delineate this dominance we used different command modalities to elicit meaningful movements and tested imitation of nonsense movements. Twenty-seven patients with unilateral hemispheric stroke and 10 age-matched controls were evaluated. Patients with left-hemisphere damage performed both meaningful and nonsense movements poorer than the other study groups; thus, the meaningfulness of the movements is irrelevant for the left-hemisphere motor dominance. The performance varied, however, with the command modality and movement type. Based on this and earlier studies we posit that the left-hemisphere motor dominance is determined by the artificiality of the test situation (it concerns movements performed to command and out of the natural context) and increased spatial and temporal complexity of the demanded movements. No association between the lesion locus within the left hemisphere and the severity of the ideomotor apraxia was found.
观念运动性失用症,即对指令做出的无序运动执行,通常继发于左半球损伤,这意味着左半球在某些类型的运动中占主导地位。为了描述这种主导地位,我们使用了不同的指令方式来引发有意义的运动,并测试了对无意义运动的模仿。对27例单侧半球卒中患者和10名年龄匹配的对照组进行了评估。左半球损伤的患者在有意义和无意义运动方面的表现均比其他研究组差;因此,运动的意义与左半球运动优势无关。然而,表现会因指令方式和运动类型而有所不同。基于此研究及早期研究,我们认为左半球运动优势取决于测试情境的人为性(它涉及根据指令执行且脱离自然情境的运动)以及所需运动在空间和时间上的复杂性增加。未发现左半球内病变部位与观念运动性失用症严重程度之间存在关联。