Haaland K Y, Harrington D L
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108.
Brain Cogn. 1994 Jan;24(1):104-22. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1006.
The performance of right and left hemisphere stroke patients was compared to normal control groups on a task where subjects alternately hit two targets which varied in size from 0.5 to 6.5 cm. The stroke patients used the arm ipsilateral to damage, and the control groups used the same arm as their respective stroke group. Lesion size and location were similar for the two stroke groups. No deficits were found for the right hemisphere stroke group. The left stroke group's tapping speed was not slower at the smallest target, but became progressively slower relative to the control group's as target size increased. Variability in tapping speed increased as target size increased for all except the left stroke group. While the entire left stroke group was as accurate as their controls, the apraxic, but not nonapraxic, patients made more errors on smaller targets only. Two explanations for these findings both emphasize the left hemisphere's special role in motor programming; one focuses upon its dominance for movements which are independent of sensory feedback and the other emphasizes its specialization for processing rapid temporal information.
研究人员让右半球和左半球中风患者与正常对照组在一项任务中进行表现对比。在该任务中,受试者需交替击打两个大小从0.5厘米到6.5厘米不等的目标。中风患者使用患侧手臂,对照组则使用与各自中风组对应的相同手臂。两个中风组的病灶大小和位置相似。右半球中风组未发现缺陷。左半球中风组在最小目标时的敲击速度并不比对照组慢,但随着目标尺寸增大,相对于对照组逐渐变慢。除左半球中风组外,所有组的敲击速度变异性都随目标尺寸增大而增加。虽然整个左半球中风组与对照组的准确性相同,但失用症患者(而非非失用症患者)仅在较小目标上出现更多错误。对于这些发现有两种解释,二者均强调左半球在运动编程中的特殊作用;一种解释聚焦于其对独立于感觉反馈的运动的主导作用,另一种解释则强调其在处理快速时间信息方面的特殊性。