Suppr超能文献

氯氮平与利培酮治疗难治性精神分裂症的开放性对照研究。

An open comparison of clozapine and risperidone in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

作者信息

Flynn S W, MacEwan G W, Altman S, Kopala L C, Fredrikson D H, Smith G N, Honer W G

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 1998 Jan;31(1):25-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979291.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clozapine and risperidone are used in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. At present, there are few reported comparisons of these drugs in this population. We report on a consecutive series of treatment-resistant schizophrenics given either clozapine or risperidone in open clinical trials.

METHOD

Subjects were treated with clozapine (n = 57) or risperidone (n = 29). Pretreatment GAF, CGI, and PANSS scores did not differ between the groups, nor did demographic variables including age, age at first hospitalization, years ill, number of previous hospitalizations, or gender. The mean treatment trial was 12.1 weeks, with mean doses of clozapine 420 mg, and risperidone 7.75 mg. The length of the trial did not differ significantly between the groups. Response was taken to be a 20% decrease in the PANSS score.

RESULTS

Using repeated measures ANOVA, PANSS total scores (F = 5.3, p = 0.02) and positive subscore (F = 7.4, p = 0.008) showed greater improvement in the clozapine group than the risperidone group, while other PANSS subscores showed a trend toward greater improvement with clozapine. The PANSS-derived factors of excitement (F = 6.7, p = 0.01), psychosocial withdrawal (F = 3.8, p = 0.05), and psychomotor retardation (F = 3.9, p = 0.05) improved more in the group treated with clozapine. The GAF (F = 10.9, p = 0.0014), CGI (F = 11.5, p = 0.0011), and CGI improvement (p = 0.0001) scores also improved more in the clozapine group. Of the clozapine group, 25 (44%) responded, while 8 (28%) of the risperidone group responded to treatment.

DISCUSSION

Clozapine had better efficacy in subjects with treatment-resistant schizophrenia compared to risperidone, although risperidone appears to yield better response rates than those previously reported for typical antipsychotics. Double-blind, controlled trials of risperidone are needed to establish its efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

摘要

背景

氯氮平和利培酮用于治疗难治性精神分裂症。目前,关于这两种药物在该人群中的比较报道较少。我们报告了在开放临床试验中连续一系列接受氯氮平或利培酮治疗的难治性精神分裂症患者的情况。

方法

受试者分别接受氯氮平治疗(n = 57)或利培酮治疗(n = 29)。两组间治疗前的大体功能评定量表(GAF)、临床总体印象量表(CGI)和阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分无差异,包括年龄、首次住院年龄、患病年限、既往住院次数或性别等人口统计学变量也无差异。平均治疗试验为期12.1周,氯氮平平均剂量为420毫克,利培酮平均剂量为7.75毫克。两组间试验时长无显著差异。以PANSS评分降低20%作为有反应的标准。

结果

采用重复测量方差分析,氯氮平组的PANSS总分(F = 5.3,p = 0.02)和阳性因子分(F = 7.4,p = 0.008)较利培酮组改善更明显,而其他PANSS因子分也显示氯氮平组有更大改善趋势。氯氮平组在兴奋(F = 6.7,p = 0.01)、社会心理退缩(F = 3.8,p = 0.05)和精神运动迟缓(F = 3.9,p = 0.05)等由PANSS衍生出的因子方面改善更明显。氯氮平组的GAF(F = 10.9,p = 0.0014)、CGI(F = 11.5,p = 0.0011)及CGI改善评分(p = 0.0001)也改善更明显。氯氮平组有25例(44%)有反应,而利培酮组有8例(28%)对治疗有反应。

讨论

与利培酮相比,氯氮平在难治性精神分裂症患者中疗效更好,尽管利培酮的反应率似乎高于先前报道的典型抗精神病药物。需要进行利培酮的双盲对照试验来确定其在难治性精神分裂症中的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验