• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受众对政治家就自身能力进行自我展示行为的认知。

Audience perceptions of politicians' self-presentational behaviors concerning their own abilities.

作者信息

Schütz A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bamberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;138(2):173-88. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600369.

DOI:10.1080/00224549809600369
PMID:9525093
Abstract

Effects of self-presentational behaviors of 2 German politicians during an election campaign were analyzed. Six scenes from interviews with the politicians were presented to 43 German students, who qualitatively evaluated the politicians' performances. The participants did not perceive behaviors such as interrupting journalists, brushing off criticism, reacting with countercriticism, and attacking the opponent personally as indicators of strength but interpreted them as signs of aggression and arrogance. On the other hand, the participants associated calm reactions to criticism, focused attacks on the opponent, and explanations of opinions and plans with self-assurance and competence. Although the participants evaluated overt positive self-description negatively, they evaluated indirect self-enhancement positively. The participants' party affiliations were largely unrelated to their evaluations.

摘要

分析了2名德国政治家在竞选活动中的自我展示行为的影响。从对这些政治家的采访中选取了6个场景展示给43名德国学生,这些学生对政治家的表现进行了定性评估。参与者并不认为打断记者、无视批评、以反驳批评回应以及人身攻击对手等行为是力量的表现,而是将其解读为攻击性和傲慢的迹象。另一方面,参与者将对批评的冷静反应、对对手的针对性攻击以及对观点和计划的解释与自信和能力联系起来。尽管参与者对公开的积极自我描述评价消极,但他们对间接的自我提升评价积极。参与者的党派归属在很大程度上与他们的评价无关。

相似文献

1
Audience perceptions of politicians' self-presentational behaviors concerning their own abilities.受众对政治家就自身能力进行自我展示行为的认知。
J Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;138(2):173-88. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600369.
2
Assessments of trust in intimate relationships and the self-perception process.对亲密关系中的信任及自我认知过程的评估。
J Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;138(2):217-28. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600373.
3
The evolving professional nursing self-image of students in baccalaureate programs: a cross-sectional survey.本科护理专业学生职业自我形象的演变:一项横断面调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):688-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
4
Motivated to penalize: women's strategic rejection of successful women.受惩罚动机:女性对成功女性的策略性排斥。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Feb;34(2):237-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167207310027.
5
A comparison of interprofessional perceptions and working relationships among health and social care students: the results of a 3-year intervention.健康与社会护理专业学生之间跨专业认知与工作关系的比较:一项为期3年干预措施的结果
Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Nov;14(6):541-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00642.x.
6
A comparison of the perceptions and aspirations of third-year physiotherapy students trained in three educational settings in Poland.在波兰三种教育环境下接受培训的三年级物理治疗专业学生的观念和抱负比较。
Physiotherapy. 2010 Mar;96(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
7
Self-esteem, gender, and alcohol use: relationships with HIV risk perception and behaviors in college students.自尊、性别与饮酒:与大学生艾滋病病毒风险认知及行为的关系
J Sex Marital Ther. 1998 Jan-Mar;24(1):29-36. doi: 10.1080/00926239808414666.
8
Achievement differences and self-concept differences: stronger associations for above or below average students?成就差异和自我概念差异:对高于或低于平均水平的学生的关联更强?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):435-50. doi: 10.1348/000709909X485234. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
9
An evaluation of college and low-income youth writing together: self-discovery and cultural connection.对大学生和低收入青年共同写作的评估:自我发现与文化联系。
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2002 Oct-Dec;25(4):255-69. doi: 10.1080/01460860290042620.
10
Academic self-handicapping: the role of self-concept clarity and students' learning strategies.学业自我妨碍:自我概念清晰度与学生学习策略的作用
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Mar;77(Pt 1):101-19. doi: 10.1348/000709905X79644.