Suppr超能文献

阿奇霉素和异帕米星对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的抗生素后效应及亚抑菌浓度效应

Postanitbiotic and sub-MIC effects of azithromycin and isepamicin against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.

作者信息

Fuentes F, Izquierdo J, Martín M M, Gomez-Lus M L, Prieto J

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Feb;42(2):414-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.2.414.

Abstract

Investigations of pharmacodynamic parameters (postantibiotic effect [PAE], sub-MIC effects [SMEs], etc.) have been progressively employed for the design of dosing schedules of antimicrobial agents. However, there are fewer in vivo than in vitro data, probably because of the simplicity of the in vitro procedures. In this study, we have investigated the in vitro PAE, SME, and previously treated (postantibiotic [PA]) SME (1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC) of azithromycin and isepamicin against standard strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli by using centrifugation to remove the antibiotics. In addition, the in vivo PAE and SME have been studied with the thigh infection model in neutropenic mice. Finally, in vivo killing curves with two dosing schedules were determined to examine whether the PAE can cover the time that antimicrobial agents are below the MIC. The two antimicrobial agents induced moderate-to-high in vitro PAEs, SMEs, and PA SMEs against S. aureus (>8 h) and E. coli (3.38 to >7.64 h). The in vivo PAEs were also high (from 3.0 to 3.6 h), despite the fact that isepamicin had lower times above the MIC in serum. Only azithromycin showed a high in vivo SME against the two strains (1.22 and 1.75 h), which indicated that the in vivo PAEs were possibly overestimated. In the killing kinetics, no great differences (<0.5 log10) were observed between the schedule that took the PAE into account and the continuous administration of doses. These results are comparable with those of other authors and suggest that these antimicrobial agents could be administered at longer intervals without losing effectiveness.

摘要

药效学参数(抗生素后效应[PAE]、亚抑菌浓度效应[SMEs]等)的研究已逐渐应用于抗菌药物给药方案的设计。然而,体内数据比体外数据少,这可能是因为体外实验程序较为简单。在本研究中,我们通过离心去除抗生素,研究了阿奇霉素和异帕米星对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌标准菌株的体外PAE、SME以及先前处理过的(抗生素后[PA])SME(1/2 MIC、1/4 MIC和1/8 MIC)。此外,还利用中性粒细胞减少小鼠的大腿感染模型研究了体内PAE和SME。最后,确定了两种给药方案的体内杀菌曲线,以检验PAE是否能覆盖抗菌药物低于MIC的时间。这两种抗菌药物对金黄色葡萄球菌(>8小时)和大肠杆菌(3.38至>7.64小时)诱导出中度至高的体外PAE、SME和PA SME。尽管异帕米星在血清中高于MIC的时间较短,但其体内PAE也较高(3.0至3.6小时)。只有阿奇霉素对这两种菌株显示出较高的体内SME(1.22和1.75小时),这表明体内PAE可能被高估了。在杀菌动力学方面,考虑PAE的给药方案与持续给药方案之间未观察到显著差异(<0.5 log10)。这些结果与其他作者的结果相当,表明这些抗菌药物可以延长给药间隔而不丧失疗效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of isepamicin.异帕米星的临床药代动力学与药效学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 Mar;38(3):205-23. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200038030-00002.

本文引用的文献

6
The post-antibiotic sub-MIC effect in vitro and in vivo.抗生素后亚抑菌浓度效应的体内外研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 May;31 Suppl D:159-66. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_d.159.
9
In-vivo and in-vitro study of the postantibiotic effect of meropenem.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Dec;32(6):917-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.6.917.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验