The new genetics. Implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States.
作者信息
Kinmonth A L, Reinhard J, Bobrow M, Pauker S
机构信息
General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge.
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):767-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.767.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The new genetics. Implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States.新遗传学。对英国和美国临床服务的影响。
BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):767-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.767.
2
Society and the not-so-new genetics: what are we afraid of? Some future predictions from a social scientist.社会与并非全新的遗传学：我们害怕什么？一位社会科学家的一些未来预测。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1997 Spring;13(2):299-345.
3
Is knowledge always good?知识总是有益的吗？
Genethics News. 1996 May-Jun;No. 12:6-7.
4
Resisting revolution: generalism and the new genetics.
Lancet. 1999 Dec 4;354(9194):1992-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04073-8.
5
Genetic testing and public policy.基因检测与公共政策。
BMJ. 1998 Mar 14;316(7134):852-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7134.852.
6
Genetics, ethics, and human values: human genome mapping, genetic screening and gene therapy.遗传学、伦理学与人类价值观：人类基因组图谱绘制、基因筛查与基因治疗。
NCBHR Commun. 1990 Oct-Nov;1(1):11-3.
7
Genetic services in the Czech Republic.捷克共和国的基因服务。
Eur J Hum Genet. 1997;5 Suppl 2:58-63.
8
International perspectives on ethics and human genetics.关于伦理与人类遗传学的国际视角
Suffolk Univ Law Rev. 1993 Winter;27(4):1411-56.
9
Disease gene patenting: the clinician's dilemma.疾病基因专利：临床医生的困境。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1998 Fall;7(4):433-5. doi: 10.1017/s0963180198004162.
10
Genetic screening and public health.基因筛查与公共卫生。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Aug;87(8):1275-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.8.1275.
引用本文的文献
1
The efficacy of genetic counseling for familial colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.家族性结直肠癌遗传咨询的疗效：一项荟萃分析。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70046. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70046.
2
Considering family trees as a useful tool in family medicine: a systematic review.将家谱视为家庭医学中的有用工具：一项系统综述。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Feb 27;26:e21. doi: 10.1017/S1463423625000131.
3
Expectations and psychological issues before genetic counseling: analysis of distress determinant factors.遗传咨询前的期望与心理问题：痛苦决定因素分析
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2020 Apr 29;18:10. doi: 10.1186/s13053-020-00142-1. eCollection 2020.
4
Are General Practitioners Willing and Able to Provide Genetic Services for Common Diseases?全科医生是否愿意且有能力为常见疾病提供基因检测服务？
J Genet Couns. 1999 Oct;8(5):301-11. doi: 10.1023/A:1022934316284.
5
A Prospective Comparison Study of Different Methods of Gathering Self-Reported Family History Information for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.一项关于收集自我报告家族病史信息以进行乳腺癌风险评估的不同方法的前瞻性比较研究。
J Genet Couns. 2003 Apr;12(2):151-70. doi: 10.1023/A:1022611307167.
6
Factors influencing consultation to discuss family history of cancer by asymptomatic patients in primary care.影响初级保健中无症状患者就癌症家族史进行咨询的因素。
J Community Genet. 2011 Mar;2(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0034-4. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
7
Delivering a pharmacogenetic service: is there a role for genetic counselors?提供药物遗传学服务：遗传咨询师能发挥作用吗？
J Genet Couns. 2012 Aug;21(4):527-35. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9415-4. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
8
The impact of risk information exposure on women's beliefs about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations.风险信息披露对女性关于直接面向消费者的 BRCA 基因突变基因检测的信念的影响。
Clin Genet. 2012 Jan;81(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01797.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
9
Family history in primary care: understanding GPs' resistance to clinical genetics--qualitative study.家庭病史在初级保健中的应用：了解全科医生对临床遗传学的抵制——定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 May;60(574):e221-30. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X501868.
10
Risk information exposure and direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations among women with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer.有个人或家族乳腺癌或卵巢癌病史的女性中BRCA突变的风险信息暴露与直接面向消费者的基因检测
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1303-11. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0825. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
本文引用的文献
1
The potential social impact of predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to common chronic diseases: a review and proposed research agenda.常见慢性病易感性预测基因检测的潜在社会影响：综述与研究议程建议
Sociol Health Illn. 1994 Jun;16(3):340-71. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11348762.
2
Managed genetic care in a large HMO.
HMO Pract. 1996 Jun;10(2):54-8.
3
The new genetics. Psychological responses to genetic testing.新遗传学。对基因检测的心理反应。
BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):693-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.693.
4
The new genetics in clinical practice.临床实践中的新遗传学
BMJ. 1998 Feb 21;316(7131):618-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7131.618.
5
Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in primary care: evaluation of a project in South Wales. The South Wales Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening Research Team.初级保健中囊性纤维化的携带者筛查：南威尔士一个项目的评估。南威尔士囊性纤维化携带者筛查研究团队。
Clin Genet. 1997 Mar;51(3):153-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1997.tb02445.x.
6
Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.关于采用预测试教育方法以增强BRCA1基因检测知情决策的对照试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jan 15;89(2):148-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.2.148.
7
Teaching efficacy of a medical education module on genetic testing for cancer.一个关于癌症基因检测的医学教育模块的教学效果
J Cancer Educ. 1996 Winter;11(4):196-202. doi: 10.1080/08858199609528428.
8
Couple-based prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis in primary care settings.在基层医疗环境中基于夫妻的囊性纤维化产前筛查。
Prenat Diagn. 1996 May;16(5):397-404. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199605)16:5<397::AID-PD864>3.0.CO;2-I.
9
The views of general practitioners on community carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.全科医生对囊性纤维化社区携带者筛查的看法。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 May;46(406):299-301.
10
Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.基层医疗环境中的囊性纤维化携带者群体筛查。
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jul;59(1):234-47.
Zotero 插件