• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Inclusion or pull-out: which do students prefer?

作者信息

Klingner J K, Vaughn S, Schumm J S, Cohen P, Forgan J W

机构信息

University of Miami, School of Education, Coral Gables, FL 33124-2040, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;31(2):148-58. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100205.

DOI:10.1177/002221949803100205
PMID:9529785
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to better understand students' perceptions of and preferences for inclusion or pull-out service delivery models. Thirty-two students with and without learning disabilities who had participated in both models during the past 2 or 3 years were interviewed individually. Key questions assessed their perceptions of which model was most conducive to academic learning and which was most likely to yield social benefits, and the reasons for their beliefs. Results indicated that students' views varied. Overall, more children identified pull-out as the model of choice, but many children were confident that inclusion was meeting their academic and social needs. We interpret the results of this study as providing support for maintaining a continuum of service delivery options and for considering the placement of each child individually, based on his or her unique needs.

摘要

相似文献

1
Inclusion or pull-out: which do students prefer?
J Learn Disabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;31(2):148-58. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100205.
2
[Comparing students in inclusive education to those in special schools: the view of parents of children with learning disabilities].[将融合教育中的学生与特殊学校的学生进行比较:学习障碍儿童家长的看法]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2004 Dec;53(10):685-706.
3
A study of the effects of an inclusion model on students with specific learning disabilities.
J Learn Disabil. 1995 Oct;28(8):511-22. doi: 10.1177/002221949502800806.
4
Students' preferences for service delivery: pull-out, in-class, or integrated models.学生对服务提供方式的偏好:抽出式、课堂式或综合模式。
Except Child. 1989 Apr;55(6):516-23. doi: 10.1177/001440298905500605.
5
When cooperative learning improves the achievement of students with mild disabilities: a response to Tateyama-Sniezek.合作学习何时能提高轻度残疾学生的成绩:对立山-斯涅泽克的回应。
Except Child. 1990;57(3):276-80. doi: 10.1177/001440299105700311.
6
The perspectives of mothers whose children are in special day classes for learning disabilities.孩子参加学习障碍特殊日间课程的母亲们的观点。
J Learn Disabil. 1992 Oct;25(8):539-43. doi: 10.1177/002221949202500809.
7
Instructional and curricular requisites of mainstreamed students with learning disabilities.有学习障碍的随班就读学生的教学与课程要求。
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Jun-Jul;24(6):354-60, 353. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400604.
8
Pull-out programs.退出计划。
J Learn Disabil. 1990 Nov;23(9):524-5.
9
Teachers' attitudes toward increased mainstreaming: implementing effective instruction for students with learning disabilities.教师对增加全纳教育的态度:为学习障碍学生实施有效教学。
J Learn Disabil. 1995 Feb;28(2):87-94, 120. doi: 10.1177/002221949502800203.
10
The effects of educational placement and grade level on the self-perceptions of low achievers and students with learning disabilities.
J Learn Disabil. 1994 May;27(5):325-34. doi: 10.1177/002221949402700509.