Suppr超能文献

接触性变应原体外试验开发的实验研究。2. 接触性变应原体外致敏试验与豚鼠最大化试验的比较。

Experimental study for the development of an in vitro test for contact allergens. 2. Comparison of the in vitro sensitization test with the guinea pig maximization test for contact allergens.

作者信息

Arimura M, Yokozeki H, Katayama I, Nakamura T, Masuda M, Nishioka K

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1998 Mar;115(3):228-34. doi: 10.1159/000023905.

Abstract

We have previously reported an in vitro hapten-specific sensitization method using Pam-212 cells (in vitro sensitization test) to identify the potential effectiveness of contact allergens. In the present study, we conducted comparison studies of 11 allergens and 2 irritants in order to evaluate the method as an alternative predictive test. The guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) was developed based on the test described by Magnusson and Kligman. Our assay was carried out as follows: we treated Pam-212 cells with 13 test chemical solutions, while T cells and macrophages of BALB/c mice were cultured with hapten-conjugated Pam-212 cells for 5 days. After incubation, 10(5) T cells were stimulated with mitomycin-C-treated spleen cells conjugated with chemicals. Three days later, the [3H]methyl thymidine incorporation was counted. The results of the GPMT were in agreement with those reported in previous studies except for benzocaine. In our GPMT experiments, benzocaine was negative, but it had been classified as a moderate sensitizer in previous studies. Our assay detected extreme, strong and moderate sensitizers as previously classified by the GPMT They could be summarized as follows: three of five chemicals classified as moderate sensitizers, and 100% of strong or extreme sensitizers were detected by both the GPMT and the in vitro sensitization test. No irritants showed a positive reaction in our assay. These results support the view that the sensitivity of our in vitro test may be equivalent to that of the GPMT and may be useful as a rapid and objective allergen screening test.

摘要

我们之前报道了一种使用Pam-212细胞的体外半抗原特异性致敏方法(体外致敏试验),以确定接触性变应原的潜在有效性。在本研究中,我们对11种变应原和2种刺激物进行了比较研究,以便评估该方法作为一种替代预测试验的效果。豚鼠最大化试验(GPMT)是基于Magnusson和Kligman描述的试验开发的。我们的试验如下进行:用13种测试化学溶液处理Pam-212细胞,同时将BALB/c小鼠的T细胞和巨噬细胞与半抗原偶联的Pam-212细胞共培养5天。孵育后,用与化学物质偶联的丝裂霉素-C处理的脾细胞刺激10(5)个T细胞。三天后,计数[3H]甲基胸腺嘧啶核苷掺入量。除苯佐卡因外,GPMT的结果与先前研究报道的结果一致。在我们的GPMT实验中,苯佐卡因呈阴性,但在先前研究中它被归类为中度致敏剂。我们的试验检测到了如先前GPMT分类的极、强和中度致敏剂。它们可总结如下:GPMT和体外致敏试验均检测到了五种被归类为中度致敏剂的化学物质中的三种,以及100%的强或极致敏剂。在我们的试验中,没有刺激物显示出阳性反应。这些结果支持这样一种观点,即我们体外试验所具有的敏感性可能与GPMT相当,并且可能作为一种快速、客观的变应原筛选试验有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验