Moulton R J, Brown J I, Konasiewicz S J
Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 1998 Feb;25(1):S7-11. doi: 10.1017/s031716710003465x.
We report on our experience with long-term monitoring of the EEG power spectrum and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in 103 patients with severe closed head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale-GCS < or = 8). Patients were monitored for an average of 5 days post injury and monitoring was terminated when they died, regained consciousness or their intracranial physiologic parameters (primarily intracranial pressure-ICP) were stable for 2-3 days. Patients were treated according to a standard protocol that included mechanical ventilation, sedation, and neuromuscular blockade. At 7 of 9 twelve hour time intervals post injury, SSEPs were significantly (p < .05) different between outcome groups using the Glasgow Outcome Score collapsed to 3 categories. The percent slow (delta) activity in the EEG was not significantly different between outcome groups at any time point, post injury. The total power in the EEG power spectrum differed only at the last time epoch post injury (108 hr.). Based on the superior prognostic capabilities of the SSEP, we routinely base critical management decisions on SSEP values. We have not been able to rely on EEG parameters for these same decisions due to the lack of clear distinction between good and poor prognosis groups based on common EEG parameters.
我们报告了对103例重度闭合性颅脑损伤(格拉斯哥昏迷量表 - GCS≤8)患者进行脑电图功率谱和体感诱发电位(SSEP)长期监测的经验。患者在受伤后平均监测5天,当患者死亡、恢复意识或其颅内生理参数(主要是颅内压 - ICP)稳定2 - 3天时监测终止。患者按照包括机械通气、镇静和神经肌肉阻滞的标准方案进行治疗。在受伤后9个十二小时时间段中的7个时间段,使用简化为3类的格拉斯哥预后评分,不同预后组之间的SSEP存在显著差异(p <.05)。受伤后任何时间点,不同预后组脑电图中慢波(δ波)活动百分比均无显著差异。脑电图功率谱中的总功率仅在受伤后的最后一个时间段(108小时)有所不同。基于SSEP卓越的预后评估能力,我们在关键管理决策中常规依据SSEP值。由于基于常见脑电图参数的预后良好组和预后不良组之间缺乏明确区分,我们无法依靠脑电图参数做出相同决策。