• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Test equating: what, why, how?

作者信息

Zhu W

机构信息

Division of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Wayne State University, USA.

出版信息

Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Mar;69(1):11-23. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607662.

DOI:10.1080/02701367.1998.10607662
PMID:9532618
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce test equating, including its concept, needs, and methods, to the field of physical education and exercise science. Both traditional and item response theory (IRT) equating methods, along with data collection designs, were described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of these methods were also introduced. In addition, equating errors and evaluation criteria, sample size, and related computer programs were introduced. Using an existing data set of sit-up tests, a test-equating application was illustrated through a step-by-step example. As a result, two sit-up tests were equated onto a common scale, and equating accuracy was evaluated using both equating and cross-validation samples. Finally, benefits and potential applications of test equating in assessing motor functions and skills, as well as future research challenges, were described.

摘要

相似文献

1
Test equating: what, why, how?
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Mar;69(1):11-23. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607662.
2
IRT test equating in complex linkage plans.复杂连锁计划中的IRT测试等值
Psychometrika. 2013 Jul;78(3):464-80. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9316-y. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
3
Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.健康科学教育中的项目反应理论测试等值
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Mar;13(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9020-8. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
4
Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior.项目反应理论与运动行为测量
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Dec;60(4):325-35. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607459.
5
Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.等同于拉施量表中使用的设计和程序。
J Appl Meas. 2010;11(2):182-95.
6
Making bootstrap statistical inferences: a tutorial.进行自助法统计推断:教程
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997 Mar;68(1):44-55. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1997.10608865.
7
Efficiency Analysis of Item Response Theory Kernel Equating for Mixed-Format Tests.混合格式测验的项目反应理论核等值效率分析
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Nov;47(7-8):496-512. doi: 10.1177/01466216231209757. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
8
A Comparison of IRT Observed Score Kernel Equating and Several Equating Methods.IRT观测分数核等值法与几种等值方法的比较
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 6;11:308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00308. eCollection 2020.
9
Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.将等值和题库建设与拉施模型相结合。
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(4):409-34.
10
Cross-validation of an equating method linking aerobic FITNESSGRAM® field tests.有氧能力测试(FITNESSGRAM®)关联等距法的效标关联验证
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;41(4 Suppl 2):S124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Rasch analysis to examine the distress thermometer's cut-off scores among a mixed group of patients with cancer.运用 RASCH 分析检验癌症混合患者人群中使用痛苦温度计的截断分数。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Oct;23(8):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0673-0. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
2
Deriving utility scores from the SF-36 health instrument using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析从SF-36健康调查问卷得出效用分数。
Qual Life Res. 2008 Nov;17(9):1183-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9395-5. Epub 2008 Sep 30.