McLeskey S W, Zhang L, El-Ashry D, Trock B J, Lopez C A, Kharbanda S, Tobias C A, Lorant L A, Hannum R S, Dickson R B, Kern F G
Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Mar;4(3):697-711.
Although the antiestrogen tamoxifen has been the mainstay of therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, successful treatment of responsive tumors is often followed by the acquisition of tamoxifen resistance. Subsequently, only 30-40% of patients have a positive response to second hormonal therapies. This lack of response might be explained by mechanisms for tamoxifen resistance that sensitize ER pathways to small amounts of estrogenic activity present in tamoxifen or that bypass ER pathways completely. To elucidate one possible mechanism of tamoxifen resistance, we treated ovariectomized tumor-bearing mice injected with fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-transfected MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells with the steroidal antiestrogen ICI 182,780 or one of two aromatase inhibitors, 4-OHA or letrozole. These treatments did not slow estrogen-independent growth or prevent metastasis of tumors produced by FGF-transfected MCF-7 cells in ovariectomized nude mice. FGF-transfected cells had diminished responses to ICI 182,780 in vitro, suggesting that autocrine activity of the transfected FGF may be replacing estrogen as a mitogenic stimulus for tumor growth. ER levels in FGF transfectants were not down-regulated, and basal levels of transcripts for estrogen-induced genes or of ER-mediated transcription of estrogen response element (ERE) luciferase reporter constructs in the FGF expressing cells were not higher than parental cells, implying that altered hormonal responses are not due to down-regulation of ER or to FGF-mediated activation of ER. These studies indicate that estrogen independence may be achieved through FGF signaling pathways independent of ER pathways. If so, therapies directed at the operative mechanism might produce a therapeutic response or allow a response to a second course of antiestrogen treatment.
尽管抗雌激素药物他莫昔芬一直是雌激素受体(ER)阳性乳腺癌治疗的主要手段,但对反应性肿瘤的成功治疗往往随后会出现他莫昔芬耐药。随后,只有30%-40%的患者对第二种激素疗法有阳性反应。这种缺乏反应可能是由他莫昔芬耐药机制所解释的,这些机制使ER通路对他莫昔芬中存在的少量雌激素活性敏感,或者完全绕过ER通路。为了阐明他莫昔芬耐药的一种可能机制,我们用甾体抗雌激素ICI 182,780或两种芳香化酶抑制剂之一4-OHA或来曲唑治疗注射了成纤维细胞生长因子(FGF)转染的MCF-7乳腺癌细胞的去卵巢荷瘤小鼠。这些治疗并未减缓雌激素非依赖性生长,也未预防去卵巢裸鼠中FGF转染的MCF- 的肿瘤转移。FGF转染的细胞在体外对ICI 182,780的反应减弱,这表明转染的FGF的自分泌活性可能正在取代雌激素作为肿瘤生长的促有丝分裂刺激物。FGF转染细胞中的ER水平未下调,雌激素诱导基因的转录本基础水平或FGF表达细胞中雌激素反应元件(ERE)荧光素酶报告构建体的ER介导转录水平不高于亲本细胞,这意味着激素反应改变不是由于ER下调或FGF介导的ER激活。这些研究表明,雌激素非依赖性可能通过独立于ER通路 的FGF信号通路实现。如果是这样,针对作用机制的疗法可能会产生治疗反应,或者允许对第二轮抗雌激素治疗产生反应。