Herman M E, Katzenellenbogen B S
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801-3704, USA.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1996 Oct;59(2):121-34. doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(96)00114-8.
To understand better the antiestrogen-resistant phenotype that frequently develops in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen, we cultured MCF-7 breast cancer cells long-term (>1 yr) in the presence of the antiestrogen trans-hydroxytamoxifen (TOT) to generate a subline refractory to the growth-suppressive effects of TOT. This subline (designated MCF/TOT) showed growth stimulation, rather than inhibition, with TOT and diminished growth stimulation with estradiol (E2), yet remained as sensitive as the parental cells to growth suppression by another antiestrogen, ICI 164,384. Estrogen receptor (ER) levels were maintained at 40% of that in parent MCF-7 cells, but MCF/TOT cells failed to show an increase in progesterone receptor content in response to E2 or TOT treatment. In contrast, the MCF/TOT subline behaved like parental cells in terms of E2 and TOT regulation of ER and pS2 expression and transactivation of a transiently transfected estrogen-responsive gene construct. DNA sequencing of the hormone binding domain of the ER from both MCF-7 and MCF/TOT cells confirmed the presence of wild-type ER and exon 5 and exon 7 deletion splice variants, but showed no point mutations. Compared to the parental cells, the MCF/TOT subline showed reduced sensitivity to the growth-suppressive effects of retinoic acid and complete resistance to exogenous TGF-beta1. The altered growth responsiveness of MCF/TOT cells to TOT and TGF-beta1 was partly to fully reversible following TOT withdrawal for 16 weeks. Our findings underscore the fact that antiestrogen resistance is response-specific; that loss of growth suppression by TOT appears to be due to the acquisition of weak growth stimulation; and that resistance to TOT does not mean global resistance to other more pure antiestrogens such as ICI 164,384, implying that these antiestrogens must act by somewhat different mechanisms. The association of reduced retinoic acid responsiveness and insensitivity to exogenous TGF-beta with antiestrogen growth resistance in these cells supports the increasing evidence for interrelationships among cell regulatory pathways utilized by these three growth-suppressive agents in breast cancer cells. In addition, our findings indicate that one mechanism of antiestrogen resistance, as seen in MCF/TOT cells, may involve alterations in growth factor and other hormonal pathways that affect the ER response pathway.
为了更好地理解接受他莫昔芬治疗的乳腺癌患者中经常出现的抗雌激素耐药表型,我们在抗雌激素反式羟基他莫昔芬(TOT)存在的情况下长期培养MCF-7乳腺癌细胞(>1年),以产生对TOT生长抑制作用具有抗性的亚系。这个亚系(命名为MCF/TOT)在TOT作用下表现为生长刺激而非抑制,对雌二醇(E2)的生长刺激作用减弱,但对另一种抗雌激素ICI 164,384的生长抑制作用仍与亲代细胞一样敏感。雌激素受体(ER)水平维持在亲代MCF-7细胞的40%,但MCF/TOT细胞在E2或TOT处理后孕酮受体含量未增加。相反,在ER和pS2表达以及瞬时转染的雌激素反应基因构建体的反式激活的E2和TOT调节方面,MCF/TOT亚系的表现与亲代细胞相似。对MCF-7和MCF/TOT细胞的ER激素结合结构域进行DNA测序,证实存在野生型ER以及外显子5和外显子7缺失剪接变体,但未发现点突变。与亲代细胞相比,MCF/TOT亚系对维甲酸的生长抑制作用敏感性降低,对外源TGF-β1完全耐药。在撤去TOT 16周后,MCF/TOT细胞对TOT和TGF-β1改变的生长反应性部分至完全可逆。我们的研究结果强调了抗雌激素耐药是反应特异性的这一事实;TOT生长抑制作用的丧失似乎是由于获得了微弱的生长刺激;对TOT的耐药并不意味着对其他更纯的抗雌激素如ICI 164,384产生全面耐药,这意味着这些抗雌激素的作用机制可能有所不同。这些细胞中维甲酸反应性降低和对外源TGF-β不敏感与抗雌激素生长耐药的关联,支持了越来越多的证据表明这三种生长抑制因子在乳腺癌细胞中利用的细胞调节途径之间存在相互关系。此外,我们的研究结果表明,如在MCF/TOT细胞中所见的抗雌激素耐药的一种机制可能涉及影响ER反应途径的生长因子和其他激素途径的改变。